Unusual linkage patterns of ligands and their cognate receptors indicate a novel reason for non-random gene order in the human genome

被引:11
作者
Hurst, LD [1 ]
Lercher, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2148-5-62
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Prior to the sequencing of the human genome it was typically assumed that, tandem duplication aside, gene order is for the most part random. Numerous observers, however, highlighted instances in which a ligand was linked to one of its cognate receptors, with some authors suggesting that this may be a general and/or functionally important pattern, possibly associated with recombination modification between epistatically interacting loci. Here we ask whether ligands are more closely linked to their receptors than expected by chance. Results: We find no evidence that ligands are linked to their receptors more closely than expected by chance. However, in the human genome there are approximately twice as many co-occurrences of ligand and receptor on the same human chromosome as expected by chance. Although a weak effect, the latter might be consistent with a past history of block duplication. Successful duplication of some ligands, we hypothesise, is more likely if the cognate receptor is duplicated at the same time, so ensuring appropriate titres of the two products. Conclusion: While there is an excess of ligands and their receptors on the same human chromosome, this cannot be accounted for by classical models of non-random gene order, as the linkage of ligands/receptors is no closer than expected by chance. Alternative hypotheses for nonrandom gene order are hence worth considering.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Biological effects of targeted inactivation of hepatocyte growth factor-like protein in mice [J].
Bezerra, JA ;
Carrick, TL ;
Degen, JL ;
Witte, D ;
Degen, SJF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1998, 101 (05) :1175-1183
[2]  
BODMER WF, 1962, ADV GENET, V11, P1
[3]   Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages [J].
Bourque, G ;
Zdobnov, EM ;
Bork, P ;
Pevzner, PA ;
Tesler, G .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (01) :98-110
[4]   Large clusters of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome [J].
Boutanaev, AM ;
Kalmykova, AI ;
Shevelyov, YY ;
Nurminsky, DI .
NATURE, 2002, 420 (6916) :666-669
[5]   The human transcriptome map:: Clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains [J].
Caron, H ;
van Schaik, B ;
van der Mee, M ;
Baas, F ;
Riggins, G ;
van Sluis, P ;
Hermus, MC ;
van Asperen, R ;
Boon, K ;
Voûte, PA ;
Heisterkamp, S ;
van Kampen, A ;
Versteeg, R .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5507) :1289-+
[6]   A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression [J].
Cohen, BA ;
Mitra, RD ;
Hughes, JD ;
Church, GM .
NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 26 (02) :183-186
[7]  
COOPER DN, 1999, HUMAN GENE EVOLUTION
[8]   Interleukin-1 receptor cluster:: Gene organization of IL1R2, IL1R1, IL1RL2 (IL-1Rrp2), IL1RL1 (T1/ST2), and IL18R1 (IL-1Rrp) on human chromosome 2q [J].
Dale, M ;
Nicklin, MJH .
GENOMICS, 1999, 57 (01) :177-179
[9]  
Davidson A. C., 1997, BOOTSTRAP METHODS TH
[10]   HOVERGEN - A DATABASE OF HOMOLOGOUS VERTEBRATE GENES [J].
DURET, L ;
MOUCHIROUD, D ;
GOUY, M .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1994, 22 (12) :2360-2365