Accuracy assessment using sub-pixel fractional error matrices of global land cover products derived from satellite data

被引:164
作者
Latifovic, R [1 ]
Olthof, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Canada, Canada Ctr Remote Sensing, Applicat Div, Ottawa, ON K1A OY7, Canada
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
remote sensing; land cover; accuracy assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Information on land cover distribution at regional and global scales has become fundamental for studying global changes affecting ecological and climatic systems. The remote sensing community has responded to this increased interest by improving data quality and methodologies for extracting land cover information. However, in addition to the advantages provided by satellite products, certain limitations exist that need to be objectively quantified and clearly communicated to users so that they can make informed decisions on whether and how land cover products should be used. Accuracy assessment is the procedure used to quantify product quality. Some aspects of accuracy assessment for evaluating four global land cover maps over Canada are discussed in this paper. Attempts are made to quantify limiting factors resulting from the coarse spatial resolution of data used for generating land cover information at regional and global levels. Sub-pixel fractional error matrices are introduced as a more appropriate way for assessing the accuracy of mixed pixels. For classification with coarse spatial resolution data, limitations of the classification method produce a maximum achievable accuracy defined as the average percent fraction of dominant land cover of all pixels in the mapped area. Relationships among spatial resolution, landscape heterogeneity and thematic resolution were studied and reported. Other factors that can affect accuracy, such as misregistration and legend conversion, are also discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 165
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
IGBP: International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, 1990, 12 IGBP
[22]  
JANO AP, 2002, ACCURACY ASSESSMENT
[23]   Developments in the 'validation' of satellite sensor products for the study of the land surface [J].
Justice, C ;
Belward, A ;
Morisette, J ;
Lewis, P ;
Privette, J ;
Baret, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (17) :3383-3390
[24]   Land cover mapping of north and central America - Global Land Cover 2000 [J].
Latifovic, R ;
Zhu, ZL ;
Cihlar, J ;
Giri, C ;
Olthof, I .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 89 (01) :116-127
[25]  
Latifovic R., 2002, LAND COVER CLASSIFIC
[26]  
Loveland TR, 1999, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V65, P1021
[27]   Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data [J].
Loveland, TR ;
Reed, BC ;
Brown, JF ;
Ohlen, DO ;
Zhu, Z ;
Yang, L ;
Merchant, JW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (6-7) :1303-1330
[28]   Land cover characterization and change detection for environmental monitoring of pan-Europe [J].
Mücher, CA ;
Steinnocher, KT ;
Kressler, FP ;
Heunks, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (6-7) :1159-1181
[29]   Pixel- and site-based calibration and validation methods for evaluating supervised classification of remotely sensed data [J].
Muchoney, DM ;
Strahler, AH .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 81 (2-3) :290-299
[30]   Effects of landscape characteristics on land-cover class accuracy [J].
Smith, JH ;
Stehman, SV ;
Wickham, JD ;
Yang, LM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 84 (03) :342-349