Preference and acceptability of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in medical abortion with mifepristone

被引:45
作者
Arvidsson, C [1 ]
Hellborg, M [1 ]
Gemzell-Danielsson, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
acceptability; medical abortion; misoprostol; oral; vaginal;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the experience of pain, need of analgesic interventions, preference and acceptability in medical abortion up to 49 days of amenorrhea with mifepristone and orally versus vaginally administered misoprostol. Study Design: Ninety-seven women were randomised to oral misoprostol, n = 48, or vaginal misoprostol, n = 49. On day 1 of the study, both the groups received 600 mg of mifepristone. On day 3 of the study, one group received 0.4 mg of misoprostol orally and the other group received 0.8 mg of misoprostol vaginally. Results: Even though oral administration of misoprostol seemed to be associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal side effects, women in both the groups showed a clear preference towards the oral route of administration. The willingness to administer the misoprostol at home was also higher among the women in the oral group, which may in part depend on a more positive/less negative experience of the abortion. Conclusion: A majority of women prefer oral administration of misoprostol in early medical abortion. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 91
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Options for early therapeutic abortion - A comparative review [J].
Bygdeman, M ;
Danielsson, KG .
DRUGS, 2002, 62 (17) :2459-2470
[2]  
Bygdeman M, 2000, J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972), V55, P195
[3]   INDUCTION OF ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE (RU-486) AND ORAL OR VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL [J].
ELREFAEY, H ;
RAJASEKAR, D ;
ABDALLA, M ;
CALDER, L ;
TEMPLETON, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (15) :983-987
[4]   Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy [J].
Ho, PC ;
Ngai, SW ;
Liu, KL ;
Wong, GCY ;
Lee, SWH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (05) :735-738
[5]   Assessment of pain during medical procedures: A comparison of three scales [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Miller, L ;
Fisher, LD .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1998, 14 (04) :343-349
[6]  
KRUSE B, 2000, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V183, P65
[7]   THE EFFECT OF DOSE OF MIFEPRISTONE AND GESTATION ON THE EFFICACY OF MEDICAL ABORTION WITH MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL [J].
MCKINLEY, C ;
THONG, KJ ;
BAIRD, DT .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1993, 8 (09) :1502-1505
[8]  
NEWHALL EP, 2000, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V183, P44
[9]   Randomized comparison of vaginal (200 μg every 3 h) and oral (400 μg every 3 h) misoprostol when combined with mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy [J].
Ngai, SW ;
Tang, OS ;
Ho, PC .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) :2205-2208
[10]   Low-dose mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol at 48 hours for abortion up to 63 days [J].
Schaff, EA ;
Fielding, SL ;
Eisinger, SH ;
Stadalius, LS ;
Fuller, L .
CONTRACEPTION, 2000, 61 (01) :41-46