Who's Got the Data? Interdependencies in Science and Technology Collaborations

被引:52
作者
Borgman, Christine L. [1 ,2 ]
Wallis, Jillian C. [1 ,2 ]
Mayernik, Matthew S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Informat Studies, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Embedded Networked Sensing, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
来源
COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK-THE JOURNAL OF COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING AND WORK PRACTICES | 2012年 / 21卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cyberinfrastructure; data curation; data practices; escience; scientific collaboration; scientific software development; technology research; sensor networks; environmental sciences; SCIENTIFIC-DATA; ECOLOGY; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1007/s10606-012-9169-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Science and technology always have been interdependent, but never more so than with today's highly instrumented data collection practices. We report on a long-term study of collaboration between environmental scientists (biology, ecology, marine sciences), computer scientists, and engineering research teams as part of a five-university distributed science and technology research center devoted to embedded networked sensing. The science and technology teams go into the field with mutual interests in gathering scientific data. "Data" are constituted very differently between the research teams. What are data to the science teams may be context to the technology teams, and vice versa. Interdependencies between the teams determine the ability to collect, use, and manage data in both the short and long terms. Four types of data were identified, which are managed separately, limiting both reusability of data and replication of research. Decisions on what data to curate, for whom, for what purposes, and for how long, should consider the interdependencies between scientific and technical processes, the complexities of data collection, and the disposition of the resulting data.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 523
页数:39
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, A Question of Balance: Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPUTER SUPPORTED C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, LONG LIV DIG DAT COL
[4]   Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957-Present [J].
Aronova, Elena ;
Baker, Karen S. ;
Oreskes, Naomi .
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN THE NATURAL SCIENCES, 2010, 40 (02) :183-224
[5]   An international framework to promote access to data [J].
Arzberger, P ;
Schroeder, P ;
Beaulieu, A ;
Bowker, G ;
Casey, K ;
Laaksonen, L ;
Moorman, D ;
Uhlir, P ;
Wouters, P .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5665) :1777-1778
[6]  
Arzberger P., 2004, Data Science Journal, V3, P135, DOI 10.2481/dsj.3.135
[7]   Empirical studies to build a science of computer science [J].
Basili, Victor R. ;
Zelkowitz, Marvin V. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2007, 50 (11) :33-37
[8]  
Batalin MaximA., 2004, SENSYS 04, P25, DOI 10.1145/1031495.1031499
[9]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[10]  
Borgman C.L., 2007, SCHOLARSHIP DIGITAL, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/7434.003.0009