The stroke impact scale 3.0 - Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version

被引:117
作者
Carod-Artal, Francisco Javier [1 ]
Coral, Luciane Ferreira [1 ]
Trizotto, Daniele Stieven [1 ]
Moreira, Clarissa Menezes [1 ]
机构
[1] Sarah Hosp, Dept Neurol, Sarah Network Rehabil Hosp, BR-70330150 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
health-related quality of life; reliability; stroke; Stroke Impact Scale; validity;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-We sought to assess the psychometric attributes of the Brazilian version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 in stroke survivors. Methods-Patients were evaluated by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, modified Rankin Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health-related quality of life was evaluated with the MOS-Short Form 36 and SIS 3.0. Results-One hundred seventy-four stroke survivors were assessed (mean age, 56.9 years; 55.2% male). Hand function had a prominent floor effect (45.9%), whereas a ceiling effect was observed in the communication domain (17.3%). The internal consistency of SIS (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and SIS domains (item-dimension correlation, 0.17 to 0.89) were satisfactory; only the emotion domain had poor internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.49). Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 50 consecutive patients. Concerning the stability of the SIS, the weighted kappa values ranged from 0.33 (item 3a) to 0.94 (item 7e). Intraclass correlation coefficient values for the SIS domains ranged from 0.48 (emotion) to 0.94 (hand function). Standard error of measurement values for SIS domains ranged from 6.85 (mobility) to 9.63 (social participation). Regarding convergent validity, a significant correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient, P < 0.0001) was found between the SIS composite physical domain and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (-0.69), modified Rankin Scale (-0.81), Barthel Index (0.87), Lawton Scale (0.76), and MOS-Short Form 36 physical component summary (0.61). SIS domain scores significantly decreased as modified Rankin Scale scores increased (discriminative validity; ANOVA, P < 0.0001). Conclusions-The Brazilian version of SIS 3.0 has satisfactory psychometric properties and can be used in stroke survivors to assess health- related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:2477 / 2484
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Evaluation of the quality of life in Brazilian women with fibromyalgia, through the medical outcome survey 36 item short-form study [J].
Martinez, JE ;
Barauna, IS ;
Kubokawa, K ;
Pedreira, IS ;
Machado, LAM ;
Cevasco, G .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 23 (02) :64-68
[32]   INDIVIDUAL-PATIENT MONITORING IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE - ARE AVAILABLE HEALTH-STATUS SURVEYS ADEQUATE [J].
MCHORNEY, CA ;
TARLOV, AR .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 4 (04) :293-307
[33]  
Murray C., 1996, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS WO
[34]  
Nunnally J.C., 1978, Psychometric theory, V2th, DOI DOI 10.1037/018882
[35]   Testing and validation of the German version of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [J].
Petersen, C ;
Morfeld, M ;
Bullinger, M .
FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 2001, 69 (06) :284-+
[36]  
RANKIN J, 1957, Scott Med J, V2, P200
[37]   Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [J].
Schepers, V. P. M. ;
Ketelaar, M. ;
van de Port, I. G. L. ;
Visser-Meily, J. M. A. ;
Lindeman, E. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 29 (03) :221-230
[38]  
SHEIKH J I, 1986, Clinical Gerontologist, V5, P165
[39]   Neurology in developing countries - A population perspective [J].
Singhal, BS .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1998, 55 (07) :1019-1021
[40]   Psychometric evaluation of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) for proxy use [J].
van der Linden, FAH ;
Kragt, JJ ;
Klein, M ;
van der Ploeg, HM ;
Polman, CH ;
Uitdehaag, BMJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 (12) :1677-1681