Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings

被引:264
作者
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ]
Ikeda, Debra M. [2 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ]
Ruschin, Mark [3 ,4 ]
Svahn, Tony [3 ]
Timberg, Pontus [3 ]
Tingberg, Anders [3 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Diagnost Ctr Imaging & Funct Med, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Adv Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Radiat Phys, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Radiat Phys, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
Breast; Tomosynthesis; Breast cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The main purpose was to compare breast cancer visibility in one-view breast tomosynthesis (BT) to cancer visibility in one- or two-view digital mammography (DM). Thirty-six patients were selected on the basis of subtle signs of breast cancer on DM. One-view BT was performed with the same compression angle as the DM image in which the finding was least/not visible. On BT, 25 projections images were acquired over an angular range of 50 degrees, with double the dose of one-view DM. Two expert breast imagers classified one- and two-view DM, and BT findings for cancer visibility and BIRADS cancer probability in a non-blinded consensus study. Forty breast cancers were found in 37 breasts. The cancers were rated more visible on BT compared to one-view and two-view DM in 22 and 11 cases, respectively, (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Comparing one-view DM to one-view BT, 21 patients were upgraded on BIRADS classification (p < 0.01). Comparing two-view DM to one-view BT, 12 patients were upgraded on BIRADS classification (p < 0.01). The results indicate that the cancer visibility on BT is superior to DM, which suggests that BT may have a higher sensitivity for breast cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:2817 / 2825
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   NUMBER OF PROJECTIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY - INFLUENCE ON DETECTION OF BREAST DISEASE [J].
ANDERSSON, I ;
HILDELL, J ;
MUHLOW, A ;
PETTERSSON, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1978, 130 (02) :349-351
[2]   Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis:: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation [J].
Bath, M. ;
Mansson, L. G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (951) :169-176
[3]   Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection [J].
Birdwell, RL ;
Ikeda, DM ;
O'Shaughnessy, KF ;
Sickles, EA .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :192-202
[4]   Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector [J].
Bissonnette, M ;
Hansroul, M ;
Masson, E ;
Savard, S ;
Cadieux, S ;
Warmoes, P ;
Gravel, D ;
Agopyan, J ;
Polischuk, B ;
Haerer, W ;
Mertelmeier, T ;
Lo, JY ;
Chen, Y ;
Dobbins, JT ;
Jesneck, JL ;
Singh, S .
Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5745 :529-540
[5]   Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds [J].
Bochud, FO ;
Valley, JF ;
Verdun, FR ;
Hessler, C ;
Schnyder, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1365-1370
[6]   Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Jacobson, FL ;
Judy, PF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) :419-437
[7]  
Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
[8]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
[9]   Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study [J].
Good, Walter F. ;
Abrams, Gordon S. ;
Catullo, Victor J. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Gur, David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :865-869
[10]   INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA - MAMMOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE [J].
HILLEREN, DJ ;
ANDERSSON, IT ;
LINDHOLM, K ;
LINNELL, FS .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) :149-154