Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery

被引:3221
作者
Hopkins, Andrew L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Coll Life Sci, Div Biol Chem & Drug Discovery, Dundee DD1 3DF, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nchembio.118
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The dominant paradigm in drug discovery is the concept of designing maximally selective ligands to act on individual drug targets. However, many effective drugs act via modulation of multiple proteins rather than single targets. Advances in systems biology are revealing a phenotypic robustness and a network structure that strongly suggests that exquisitely selective compounds, compared with multitarget drugs, may exhibit lower than desired clinical efficacy. This new appreciation of the role of polypharmacology has significant implications for tackling the two major sources of attrition in drug development - efficacy and toxicity. Integrating network biology and polypharmacology holds the promise of expanding the current opportunity space for druggable targets. However, the rational design of polypharmacology faces considerable challenges in the need for new methods to validate target combinations and optimize multiple structure-activity relationships while maintaining drug-like properties. Advances in these areas are creating the foundation of the next paradigm in drug discovery: network pharmacology.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 690
页数:9
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [1] Multiple weak hits confuse complex systems: A transcriptional regulatory network as an example
    Agoston, V
    Csermely, P
    Pongor, S
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 71 (05)
  • [2] Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
    Albert, R
    Jeong, H
    Barabási, AL
    [J]. NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) : 378 - 382
  • [3] Kinase-likeness and kinase-privileged fragments: Toward virtual polypharmacology
    Aronov, Alex M.
    McClain, Brian
    Moody, Cameron Stuver
    Murcko, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 51 (05) : 1214 - 1222
  • [4] The knockout mouse project
    Austin, CP
    Battey, JF
    Bradley, A
    Bucan, M
    Capecchi, M
    Collins, FS
    Dove, WF
    Duyk, G
    Dymecki, S
    Eppig, JT
    Grieder, FB
    Heintz, N
    Hicks, G
    Insel, TR
    Joyner, A
    Koller, BH
    Lloyd, KCK
    Magnuson, T
    Moore, MW
    Nagy, A
    Pollock, JD
    Roses, AD
    Sands, AT
    Seed, B
    Skarnes, WC
    Snoddy, J
    Soriano, P
    Stewart, DJ
    Stewart, F
    Stillman, B
    Varmus, H
    Varticovski, L
    Verma, IM
    Vogt, TF
    von Melchner, H
    Witkowski, J
    Woychik, RP
    Wurst, W
    Yancopoulos, GD
    Young, SG
    Zambrowicz, B
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2004, 36 (09) : 921 - 924
  • [5] Network biology:: Understanding the cell's functional organization
    Barabási, AL
    Oltvai, ZN
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (02) : 101 - U15
  • [6] A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for ligands and proteins (FLAP): Theory and application
    Baroni, Massimo
    Cruciani, Gabriele
    Sciabola, Simone
    Perruccio, Francesca
    Mason, Jonathan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (02) : 279 - 294
  • [7] Bekhuis Tanja, 2006, Biomed Digit Libr, V3, P2, DOI 10.1186/1742-5581-3-2
  • [8] From molecular to biological structure and back
    Bonchev, Danail
    Buck, Gregory A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2007, 47 (03) : 909 - 917
  • [9] Can intellectualism stifle scientific discovery?
    Bond, RA
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2002, 1 (10) : 825 - 829
  • [10] Systematic discovery of multicomponent therapeutics
    Borisy, AA
    Elliott, PJ
    Hurst, NW
    Lee, MS
    Lehár, J
    Price, ER
    Serbedzija, G
    Zimmermann, GR
    Foley, MA
    Stockwell, BR
    Keith, CT
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (13) : 7977 - 7982