Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging - Comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T imaging for detection of focal malignant liver lesions

被引:37
作者
Chang, JM
Lee, JM
Lee, MW
Choi, JY
Kim, SH
Lee, JY
Han, JK
Choi, BI
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); 3.0 T MR; MR contrast media; liver neoplasms;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000192417.33989.7a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: We sought to compare the image quality, lesion conspicuity, and the diagnostic performance of 1.5 T and 3.0 T superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting focal malignant hepatic lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 35 patients with pathologically proven liver malignancy underwent both 1.5 and 3.0 T SPIO-enhanced MRI. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the altentative-free response receiver operating characteristic method. Image artifacts, quality, and the lesion conspicuity were analyzed. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesion were calculated. Results: No significant difference of area under ROC curve (Az value) was noted. The mean SNR and CNR of the lesions was higher in the 3.0 T sets. There was no difference between the 1.5 T and the 3.0 T image sets for lesion conspicuity, but the image quality was better on 1.5 T. Motion and susceptibility artifacts were more frequent on 3.0 T. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracies of the SPIO-enhanced MRI were equivalent on the 1.5 T and 3.0 T image sets. More prominent artifacts on 3.0 T superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced liver MRI counteracted advantage of higher SNR and CNR of 3.0 T.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 174
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Effect of contrast dose and field strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metastases
    Ba-Ssalamah, A
    Nöbauer-Huhmann, IM
    Pinker, K
    Schibany, N
    Prokesch, R
    Mehrain, S
    Mlynárik, V
    Fog, A
    Heimberger, K
    Trattnig, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) : 415 - 422
  • [2] Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT
    Bartolozzi, C
    Donati, F
    Cioni, D
    Procacci, C
    Morana, G
    Chiesa, A
    Grazioli, L
    Cittadini, G
    Cittadini, G
    Giovagnoni, A
    Gandini, G
    Maass, J
    Lencioni, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [3] Preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: Ferumoxides-enhanced MRI imaging versus combined helical CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography
    Choi, D
    Kim, SH
    Lim, JH
    Lee, WJ
    Jang, HJ
    Lee, SJ
    Lim, HK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) : 475 - 482
  • [4] Earls J P, 1999, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V7, P255
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla - Qualitative and quantitative comparison with 7.5 tesla
    Edelman, RR
    Salanitri, G
    Brand, R
    Dunkle, E
    Ragin, A
    Li, W
    Mehta, W
    Berlin, J
    Newmark, G
    Gore, R
    Patel, B
    Carillo, A
    Vu, A
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging
    Frayne, R
    Goodyear, BG
    Dickhoff, P
    Lauzon, ML
    Sevick, RJ
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) : 385 - 402
  • [7] Kanematsu M, 2001, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V13, P249, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<249::AID-JMRI1036>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-C
  • [9] Preoperative depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus triple-phase helical CT
    Kang, BK
    Lim, JH
    Kim, SH
    Choi, D
    Lim, HK
    Lee, WJ
    Lee, SJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [10] Dielectric resonance phenomena in ultra high field MRI
    Kangarlu, A
    Baertlein, BA
    Lee, R
    Ibrahim, TS
    Yang, LN
    Abduljalil, AM
    Robitaille, EML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (06) : 821 - 831