Observer sensitivity to small differences: A multipoint rank-order experiment

被引:18
作者
Good, WF
Sumkin, JH
Dash, N
Johns, CM
Zuley, ML
Rockette, HE
Gur, D
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430118
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE, To evaluate observer sensitivity to small differences in image presentation, a multipoint rank-order experiment was used to identify small differences or trends in observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten observers were presented with 50 sets of breast images that had been compressed at five different levels. Each set contained six images ranging from noncompressed to approximately 101:1 compression. Observers were asked to review all images of a case side by side and rank order the quality of each to enable determination of the presence or absence of masses and clustered microcalcifications. RESULTS. As a group, observers were able to detect small differences among the images, even at the lower compression levels (p <.001). As compression levels and image degradation increased, the ability to identify differences between different modes also increased. Large observer variability in discrimination ability was observed. CONCLUSION. Multipoint rank ordering of images viewed side by side can be an efficient method to identify small differences in image presentation. This approach to image ranking could be used to rule out or confirm the need for objective observer performance-type studies.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 278
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Subjective quality assessment of computed radiography hand images [J].
Britton, CA ;
Gabriele, OF ;
Chang, TS ;
Towers, JD ;
Rubin, DA ;
Good, WF ;
Gur, D .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1996, 9 (01) :21-24
[2]   CHEST RADIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF HIGH-RESOLUTION DIGITAL DISPLAYS WITH CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL FILM [J].
COX, GG ;
COOK, LT ;
MCMILLAN, JH ;
ROSENTHAL, SJ ;
DWYER, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) :771-776
[3]  
Good W F, 1994, J Digit Imaging, V7, P123
[4]  
Good W F, 1994, J Digit Imaging, V7, P77
[5]   Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: A comparison [J].
Gur, D ;
Rubin, DA ;
Kart, BH ;
Peterson, AM ;
Fuhrman, CR ;
Rockette, HE ;
King, JL .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1997, 10 (03) :103-107
[6]   SELECTION OF PROCESSING ALGORITHMS FOR DIGITAL IMAGE COMPRESSION - A RANK-ORDER STUDY [J].
HOLBERT, JM ;
STAIGER, M ;
CHANG, TS ;
TOWERS, JD ;
BRITTON, CA .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (04) :273-276
[7]   Detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities of the lungs on digitized chest radiographs: Acceptable data compression ratios [J].
Kido, S ;
Ikezoe, J ;
Kondoh, H ;
Takeuchi, N ;
Johkoh, T ;
Kohno, N ;
Tomiyama, N ;
Naito, H ;
Arisawa, J ;
Nakamura, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (01) :111-115
[8]   DATA-COMPRESSION - EFFECT ON DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY IN DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY [J].
MACMAHON, H ;
DOI, K ;
SANADA, S ;
MONTNER, SM ;
GIGER, ML ;
METZ, CE ;
NAKAMORI, N ;
YIN, FF ;
XU, XW ;
YONEKAWA, H ;
TAKEUCHI, H .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) :175-179
[10]   Relationship of subjective ratings of image quality and observer performance [J].
Rockette, HE ;
Johns, CM ;
Weissman, JL ;
Holbert, JM ;
Sumkin, JH ;
King, JL ;
Gur, D .
IMAGE PERCEPTION: MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3036 :152-159