Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires:: The LVQOL and VCM1

被引:31
作者
de Boer, MR
Terwee, CB
de Vet, HCW
Moll, AC
Völker-Dieben, HJM
van Rens, GHMB
机构
[1] VU, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] VU, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Elkerliek Hosp, Helmond, Netherlands
关键词
health-related quality of life; questionnaires; visually impaired persons;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-005-1524-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Low Vision Quality of Life (LVQOL) questionnaire and the Vision-related Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) are two of the many vision-related quality of life (QOL) questionnaires that have been developed in recent years. Although psychometric properties of the LVQOL and VCM1 compare well with other vision-related QOL questionnaires, construct and longitudinal validity have not been assessed (adequately). The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of these questionnaires by testing specific pre-specified hypotheses about the relations of these questionnaires with other measures. The percentage of hypotheses regarding the cross-sectional construct validity that were refuted for the LVQOL was 22% for the basic aspects of vision subscale, 50% for the mobility subscale, 39% for the adjustment subscale and 17% for the reading and fine work subscale. For the VCM1 this percentage was 57%. For the longitudinal construct validity the percentage of hypotheses that were refuted ranged from 33 to 75% for the LVQOL subscales and was 50% for the VCM1. In conclusion, cross-sectional construct validity was satisfactory for the LVQOL subscales, but seemed poor for the VCM1. In addition, the longitudinal validity of these scales was poor to moderate.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 248
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   International applicability of the VF-14 - An index of visual function in patients with cataracts [J].
Alonso, J ;
Espallargues, M ;
Anderson, TF ;
Cassard, SD ;
Dunn, E ;
BernthPetersen, P ;
Norregaard, JC ;
Black, C ;
Steinberg, EP ;
Anderson, GF .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (05) :799-807
[3]  
Altman DG, 1996, Practical Statistics for Medical Research
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Health measurement scales
[5]   A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[6]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[7]  
BIJLSMA JWJ, 1990, J REHABIL SCI, V3, P71
[8]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[9]   Self-assessment of the quality of vision: association of questionnaire score with objective clinical tests [J].
Carta, A ;
Braccio, L ;
Belpoliti, M ;
Soliani, L ;
Sartore, F ;
Gandolfi, SA ;
Maraini, G .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 1998, 17 (05) :506-511
[10]   Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires:: a systematic review [J].
de Boer, MR ;
Moll, AC ;
de Vet, HCW ;
Terwee, CB ;
Völker-Dieben, HJM ;
van Rens, GHMB .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2004, 24 (04) :257-273