Refining individualized consideration: Distinguishing developmental leadership and supportive leadership

被引:177
作者
Rafferty, AE [1 ]
Griffin, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Management, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1348/096317905X36731
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study explores the theoretical and empirical distinction between developmental leadership and supportive leadership, which are currently encompassed in a single sub dimension of transformational leadership, individualized consideration. Items were selected to assess these constructs, and hypotheses regarding the differential effects of developmental and supportive leadership were proposed. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the proposed distinction between developmental and supportive leadership, although these leadership factors were very strongly associated. Structural equation modelling and multi-level modelling results indicated that both developmental leadership and supportive leadership displayed unique relationships with theoretically selected outcome measures. Developmental leadership displayed significantly stronger relationships with job satisfaction, career certainty, affective commitment to the organization and role breadth self-efficacy than did supportive leadership. Results provide initial evidence in support of the discriminant validity of these two types of leadership. Discussion focuses on the need to further examine the construct of developmental leadership.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 61
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]   Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions [J].
Rafferty, AE ;
Griffin, MA .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (03) :329-354
[52]   Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support [J].
Rhoades, L ;
Eisenberger, R ;
Armeli, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (05) :825-836
[53]  
Sarros James, 2002, INT J BUSINESS STUDI, V10, P1
[54]   THE MOTIVATIONAL EFFECTS OF CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP - A SELF-CONCEPT BASED THEORY [J].
SHAMIR, B ;
HOUSE, RJ ;
ARTHUR, MB .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (04) :577-594
[55]  
Spector P., 1997, JOB SATISFACTION APP, DOI [10.4135/9781452231549, DOI 10.4135/9781452231549]
[56]  
WATERMAN RH, 2000, HARVARD BUSINESS JUL, P87
[57]   AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO METHOD EFFECTS BY USING LATENT-VARIABLE MODELS - APPLICATIONS IN ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR RESEARCH [J].
WILLIAMS, LJ ;
ANDERSON, SE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (03) :323-331
[58]   PATH-GOAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP - A METAANALYSIS [J].
WOFFORD, JC ;
LISKA, LZ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1993, 19 (04) :857-876
[59]   An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories [J].
Yukl, G .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1999, 10 (02) :285-305