Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in adults: the two-trocar technique

被引:15
作者
Fazili, Fiaz Maqbool
Al Bouq, Yousef
El Hassan, Osman. M.
Gaffar, Hossam Fawzi A.
机构
[1] King Fahad Hosp, Dept Surg, Al Medinah Al Munawarah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Ohud Hosp, Al Medinah Al Munawarah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
D O I
10.5144/0256-4947.2006.100
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Open appendectomy is still the most common method of treating appendicitis. Laparoscopic procedures for removal of the appendix by the "in" technique as an alternative to conventional appendectomy have gained wide popularity, but have been criticized for their technical difficulty and high cost. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the laparoscope-assisted appendectomy (the two-trocar technique) in adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 129 patients who had appendectomy using the laparoscope-assisted two-trocar technique between July 2002 to December 2003. The procedures were done by consultants and surgeons-in-training with experience in minimally invasive and open techniques. Locally modified endoloop and reusable trocars; were used to reduce the cost. Appendectomy was performed extra-abdominally after the appendix was identified by using a laparoscope through one port and then delivered outside through the second port using reusable laparoscopy instruments. RESULTS: The two-trocar technique was successful in 101 (78.3%) cases; 14 (10.8%) needed a third trocar to complete the operation extra-abdominally, 6 (4.6%) were converted to open surgery, and 5 (3.8%) had an intra-abdominal laparoscopic appendectomy. The mean operation time was 35 minutes (range, 30-90 minutes). Six cases (4.6%) had infection. The mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range, 2-7 days). No case of port hernia was reported during the follow-up period (range, 14-30 months). CONCLUSION: The laparoscope-assisted two-trocar technique for removal of the appendix can be performed as safely and efficiently as the open technique, but at a lower cost than the complete laparoscopic 'in" method and does not need much technical expertise. This method is recommended as an alternative procedure to open appendectomy or the complete laparoscopic "in" technique in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 104
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy [J].
Merhoff, AM ;
Merhoff, GC ;
Franklin, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05) :375-378
[12]   Appendicitis: Laparoscopic versus conventional operation - A study and review of the literature [J].
Moberg, AC ;
Montgomery, A .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 7 (06) :459-463
[13]  
Nicholson T, 2001, JSLS, V5, P47
[14]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:: Prospective randomized trial [J].
Özmen, MM ;
Zülfikaroglu, B ;
Tanik, A ;
Kale, IT .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 1999, 9 (03) :187-189
[15]   Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland:: A prospective audit of 2,179 cases [J].
Schäfer, M ;
Krähenbühl, L ;
Frei, E ;
Büchler, MW .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 17 (05) :497-502
[16]  
Tarnoff M, 1998, JSLS, V2, P153
[17]   Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in children: The two-trocar technique [J].
Valioulis, I ;
Hameury, F ;
Dahmani, L ;
Levard, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2001, 11 (06) :391-394
[18]   Umbilical one-puncture laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children [J].
Valla, JS ;
Ordorica-Flores, RM ;
Steyaert, H ;
Merrot, T ;
Bartels, AM ;
Breaud, J ;
Ginier, C ;
Cheli, M .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (01) :83-85
[19]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY IN CHILDREN - COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 403 CASES [J].
VARLET, F ;
TARDIEU, D ;
LIMONNE, B ;
METAFIOT, H ;
CHAVRIER, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1994, 4 (06) :333-337