Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:331
作者
Pape, Ulrich-Frank [1 ]
Jann, Henning [1 ]
Mueller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline [2 ]
Bockelbrink, Angelina [2 ]
Berndt, Uta [1 ]
Willich, Stefan N. [2 ]
Koch, Martin [3 ]
Roecken, Christoph [3 ]
Rindi, Guido [4 ]
Wiedenmann, Bertram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Charite Campus Mitte, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Pathol, Charite Campus Mitte, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Parma, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
neuroendocrine tumor; foregut; TNM classification; staging; grading; prognosis; survival;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23549
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system comprise a rare but challenging group of malignant neoplasms and occur at virtually any site of the GEP system. In 2006, a new TNM classification system was proposed for the staging and grading of upper GEP NETs. METHODS. The prognostic relevance of the TNM classification system was analyzed retrospectively in 202 patients from a referral center with histologically proven foregut NET. Patients were classified according to previous classification systems and the TNM classification. Survival data were acquired and statistical analyses were performed by using log-rank and Cox regression testing. RESULTS. Primary tumors were gastric (n = 48), duodenal (n = 23), and pancreatic (n = 131). During the observation period, 21% of patients died. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 75% and 64%, respectively. Previous classification systems discriminated between low-grade and high-grade malignant NETs but did not allow further prognostic differentiation. In contrast, the proposed TNM classification was able to differentiate significantly between different tumor stages (stages I-III vs stage IV; P < .01) and cellular proliferation rates according to Ki-67 labeling (grade I vs grade 2, P = .04; grade I vs grade 3 and grade 2 vs grade 3, P < .01). Cox regression analysis confirmed an increased risk of reduced survival for patients with stage III or IV NET and grade 2 or 3 NET. CONCLUSIONS. The current results demonstrated the prognostic relevance of the newly proposed TNM classification system for foregut NETs with statistical significance for the subgroups of both the staging classification and the grading system. Thus, the new classification system provides a valid and powerful tool for prognostic stratification of GEP NETs in clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [21] Randomized clinical trial of the effect of interferon α on survival in patients with disseminated midgut carcinoid tumours
    Kölby, L
    Persson, G
    Franzén, S
    Ahrén, B
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (06) : 687 - 693
  • [22] Carcinoid tumors
    Kulke, MH
    Mayer, RJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (11) : 858 - 868
  • [23] Epidemiology of carcinoid neoplasms in Vaud, Switzerland, 1974-97
    Levi, F
    Te, VC
    Randimbison, L
    Rindi, G
    La Vecchia, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (07) : 952 - 955
  • [24] From the archives of the AFIP - Gastrointestinal carcinoids: Imaging features with clinicopathologic comparison
    Levy, Angela D.
    Sobin, Leslie H.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (01) : 237 - U19
  • [25] Prognostic factors in patients with endocrine tumours of the duodenopancreatic area
    Madeira, I
    Terris, B
    Voss, M
    Denys, A
    Sauvanet, A
    Flejou, JF
    Vilgrain, V
    Belghiti, J
    Bernades, P
    Ruszniewski, P
    [J]. GUT, 1998, 43 (03) : 422 - 427
  • [26] A 50-year analysis of 562 gastric carcinoids: Small tumor or larger problem?
    Modlin, IM
    Lye, KD
    Kidd, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [27] Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids
    Modlin, IM
    Kidd, M
    Latich, I
    Zikusoka, MN
    Shapiro, MD
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 128 (06) : 1717 - 1751
  • [28] A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors
    Modlin, IM
    Lye, KD
    Kidd, M
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (04) : 934 - 959
  • [29] Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum
    Mullen, JT
    Wang, HM
    Yao, JC
    Lee, JH
    Perrier, ND
    Pisters, PWT
    Lee, JE
    Evans, DB
    [J]. SURGERY, 2005, 138 (06) : 971 - 977
  • [30] Poorly differentiated carcinomas of the foregut (gastric, duodenal and pancreatic)
    Nilsson, Ola
    Van Cutsem, Erik
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    Yao, James C.
    Pavel, Marianne E.
    McNicol, Anne M.
    Garcia, M. I. Sevilla
    Knapp, Wolfram H.
    Kelestimur, Fahrettin
    Sauvanet, Alain
    Pauwels, Stanislas
    Kwekkeboom, Dik J.
    Caplin, Martyn
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2006, 84 (03) : 212 - 215