Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:331
作者
Pape, Ulrich-Frank [1 ]
Jann, Henning [1 ]
Mueller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline [2 ]
Bockelbrink, Angelina [2 ]
Berndt, Uta [1 ]
Willich, Stefan N. [2 ]
Koch, Martin [3 ]
Roecken, Christoph [3 ]
Rindi, Guido [4 ]
Wiedenmann, Bertram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Charite Campus Mitte, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Pathol, Charite Campus Mitte, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Parma, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
neuroendocrine tumor; foregut; TNM classification; staging; grading; prognosis; survival;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23549
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system comprise a rare but challenging group of malignant neoplasms and occur at virtually any site of the GEP system. In 2006, a new TNM classification system was proposed for the staging and grading of upper GEP NETs. METHODS. The prognostic relevance of the TNM classification system was analyzed retrospectively in 202 patients from a referral center with histologically proven foregut NET. Patients were classified according to previous classification systems and the TNM classification. Survival data were acquired and statistical analyses were performed by using log-rank and Cox regression testing. RESULTS. Primary tumors were gastric (n = 48), duodenal (n = 23), and pancreatic (n = 131). During the observation period, 21% of patients died. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 75% and 64%, respectively. Previous classification systems discriminated between low-grade and high-grade malignant NETs but did not allow further prognostic differentiation. In contrast, the proposed TNM classification was able to differentiate significantly between different tumor stages (stages I-III vs stage IV; P < .01) and cellular proliferation rates according to Ki-67 labeling (grade I vs grade 2, P = .04; grade I vs grade 3 and grade 2 vs grade 3, P < .01). Cox regression analysis confirmed an increased risk of reduced survival for patients with stage III or IV NET and grade 2 or 3 NET. CONCLUSIONS. The current results demonstrated the prognostic relevance of the newly proposed TNM classification system for foregut NETs with statistical significance for the subgroups of both the staging classification and the grading system. Thus, the new classification system provides a valid and powerful tool for prognostic stratification of GEP NETs in clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [41] Epidemiology and survival in patients with carcinoid disease in the Netherlands - An epidemiological study with 2391 patients
    Quaedvlieg, PFHJ
    Visser, O
    Lamers, CBHW
    Janssen-Heijen, MLG
    Taal, BG
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (09) : 1295 - 1300
  • [42] The future of the TNM staging system in colorectal cancer: time for a debate?
    Quirke, Philip
    Williams, Geraint T.
    Ectors, Nadine
    Ensari, Arzu
    Piard, Francoise
    Nagtegaal, Iris
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (07) : 651 - 657
  • [43] Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours
    Ramage, JK
    Davies, AHG
    Ardill, J
    Bax, N
    Caplin, M
    Grossman, A
    Hawkins, R
    McNicol, AM
    Reed, N
    Sutton, R
    Thakker, R
    Aylwin, S
    Breen, D
    Britton, K
    Buchanan, K
    Corrie, P
    Gillams, A
    Lewington, V
    McCance, D
    Meeran, K
    Watkinson, A
    [J]. GUT, 2005, 54 : iv1 - iv16
  • [44] ECL cell tumor and poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma of the stomach: Prognostic evaluation by pathological analysis
    Rindi, G
    Azzoni, C
    La Rosa, S
    Klersy, C
    Paolotti, D
    Rappel, S
    Stolte, M
    Capella, C
    Bordi, C
    Solcia, E
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (03) : 532 - 542
  • [45] TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors:: a consensus proposal including a grading system
    Rindi, G.
    Kloeppel, G.
    Alhman, H.
    Caplin, M.
    Couvelard, A.
    de Herder, W. W.
    Erikssson, B.
    Falchetti, A.
    Falconi, M.
    Komminoth, P.
    Koerner, M.
    Lopes, J. M.
    McNicol, A-M.
    Nilsson, O.
    Perren, A.
    Scarpa, A.
    Scoazec, J. -Y
    Wiedenmann, B.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2006, 449 (04) : 395 - 401
  • [46] Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors: Why such guidelines and how we went about it
    Rindi, Guido
    de Herder, Wouter W.
    O'Toole, Dermot
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2006, 84 (03) : 155 - 157
  • [47] Well-differentiated gastric tumors/carcinomas
    Ruszniewski, Philippe
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    Cadiot, Guillaume
    Komminoth, Paul
    Chung, Daniel
    Kos-Kudla, Beata
    Kianmanesh, Reza
    Hochhauser, David
    Arnold, Rudolf
    Ahlman, Hakan
    Pauwels, Stanislas
    Kwekkeboom, Dik J.
    Rindi, Guido
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2006, 84 (03) : 158 - 164
  • [48] Sobin L.H., 2009, UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumors, V7th
  • [49] Carcinoids of the pancreas - An analysis of 156 cases
    Soga, J
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (06) : 1180 - 1187
  • [50] Solcia E, 2000, Histological typing of endocrine tumors (WHO International Histological Classification of Tumors) WHO