The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location: A cadaveric study

被引:99
作者
Barber, FA
Feder, SM
Burkhart, SS
Ahrens, J
机构
[1] MCGAW INC, CARROLLTON, TX USA
[2] UNIV TEXAS, HLTH SCI CTR, SAN ANTONIO, TX USA
[3] SAN ANTONIO ORTHOPAED GRP, SAN ANTONIO, TX USA
[4] INST SPINE & BIOMED RES, PLANO, TX USA
关键词
suture anchor; failure load; bone mineral density; osteoporosis; rotator cuff;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90031-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate spatial variations in the pullout strength of a suture anchor in the proximal humerus, and to correlate any differences with the local bone mineral density (BMD). Screw-type suture anchors threaded with wire sutures were inserted at six different anchor insertion sites in 11 human cadaveric humeri (average age, 80 years), Load to failure tests with forces applied in line with the axis of insertion were performed, and bone mineral density measurements were then made at these sites. The greater tuberosity showed anterior and posterior differences in anchor pullout force (P =.03), with the posterior portion showing higher strength (154 N) than the anterior area (96 N). Neither the lesser tuberosity (185 N anterior area and 177 N posterior area) nor the humeral neck (170 N anterior area and 174 N posterior area) showed significant differences? and they were statistically equivalent to the greater tuberosity. There was no demonstrable difference in BMD at any of the six sites tested. There is no support for the hypothesis that significant differences in load to failure exist among the lesser tuberosity, humeral neck, and greater tuberosity. Also, there is no support for the hypothesis that the load to failure variations for the proximal humerus are dependent on BMD. Bone mineral density appears to have no correlation with the pullout strength of a screw-type suture anchor.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 345
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF SUTURE ANCHORS [J].
BARBER, FA ;
HERBERT, MA ;
CLICK, JN .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (01) :21-28
[2]   Suture anchor strength revisited [J].
Barber, FA ;
Herbert, MA ;
Click, JN .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (01) :32-38
[3]   THE DEADMAN THEORY OF SUTURE ANCHORS - OBSERVATIONS ALONG A SOUTH TEXAS FENCE LINE [J].
BURKHART, SS .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (01) :119-123
[4]   Margin convergence: A method of reducing strain in massive rotator cuff tears [J].
Burkhart, SS ;
Athanasiou, KA ;
Wirth, MA .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (03) :335-338
[5]  
BURKHART SS, 1996, 15 ANN ARTHR ASS N A
[6]   ARTHROGRAPHY OF THE SHOULDER AFTER OPERATIVE REPAIR OF THE TORN ROTATOR CUFF [J].
CALVERT, PT ;
PACKER, NP ;
STOKER, DJ ;
BAYLEY, JIL ;
KESSEL, L .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1986, 68 (01) :147-150
[7]   INFLUENCE OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY ON THE FIXATION OF THORACOLUMBAR IMPLANTS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF TRANSPEDICULAR SCREWS, LAMINAR HOOKS, AND SPINOUS PROCESS WIRES [J].
COE, JD ;
WARDEN, KE ;
HERZIG, MA ;
MCAFEE, PC .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (09) :902-907
[8]  
Craft D V, 1996, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V5, P32, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(96)80028-0
[9]   BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF ROTATOR CUFF FIXATION METHODS [J].
FRANCE, EP ;
PAULOS, LE ;
HARNER, CD ;
STRAIGHT, CB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (02) :176-181
[10]   MECHANICAL STRENGTH OF REPAIRS OF THE ROTATOR CUFF [J].
GERBER, C ;
SCHNEEBERGER, AG ;
BECK, M ;
SCHLEGEL, U .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1994, 76B (03) :371-380