The Impact of Family Involvement on SMEs' Performance: Theory and Evidence

被引:106
作者
De Massis, Alfredo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kotlar, Josip [4 ]
Campopiano, Giovanna [3 ]
Cassia, Lucio [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, Ctr Family Business, Lancaster LA1 4QL, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, IEED, Family Business & Innovat, Lancaster LA1 4QL, England
[3] Univ Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
[4] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, IEED, Lancaster LA1 4QL, England
[5] Univ Bergamo, Strateg Management, Bergamo, Italy
[6] CYFE, Bergamo, Italy
关键词
TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; AGENCY COSTS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; DECISION-MAKING; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; OWNERSHIP DISPERSION; CONCEPTUAL ISSUES; BOARD COMPOSITION; UPPER ECHELONS;
D O I
10.1111/jsbm.12093
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
By complementing agency theory with behavioral assumptions, we explore the effects of family involvement on small and medium enterprises' (SMEs) performance. We identify three separate dimensions of family involvement and hypothesize nonlinear, direct, and interaction effects on the performance of an SME. The evidence on 787 SMEs suggests that an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between family ownership and performance, and ownership dispersion among family members negatively affects performance. Balancing family and nonfamily members in the top management team (TMT) is found to be beneficial to SMEs' performance, but the family ratio in the TMT becomes crucial only at high levels of family ownership.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 948
页数:25
相关论文
共 132 条
[21]  
Blau P., 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity
[22]  
Block J., 2011, J. Fam. Bus. Strategy, V2, P232, DOI [10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JFBS.2011.10.001]
[23]   DIFFERENTIATING ENTREPRENEURS FROM SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS - A CONCEPTUALIZATION [J].
CARLAND, JW ;
HOY, F ;
BOULTON, WR ;
CARLAND, JAC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (02) :354-359
[24]   Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms [J].
Carney, M .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 29 (03) :249-265
[25]   Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition [J].
Carpenter, MA ;
Geletkanycz, MA ;
Sanders, WG .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2004, 30 (06) :749-778
[26]   The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance [J].
Carpenter, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (03) :275-284
[27]   Does the CFO matter in family firms? Evidence from Italy [J].
Caselli, Stefano ;
Di Giuli, Alberta .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 16 (05) :381-411
[28]   Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family-Centered Non-Economic Goals in Small Firms [J].
Chrisman, James J. ;
Chua, Jess H. ;
Pearson, Allison W. ;
Barnett, Tim .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 36 (02) :267-293
[29]   Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm [J].
Chrisman, JJ ;
Chua, JH ;
Sharma, P .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 29 (05) :555-575
[30]   Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence [J].
Chrisman, JJ ;
Chua, JH ;
Litz, RA .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2004, 28 (04) :335-354