TOWARD REIMAGINING STRATEGY RESEARCH: RETROSPECTION AND PROSPECTION ON THE 2011 AMR DECADE AWARD ARTICLE

被引:130
作者
Priem, Richard L. [1 ,2 ]
Butler, John E. [3 ]
Li, Sali [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas Christian Univ, Neeley Sch Business, Ft Worth, TX 76129 USA
[2] LUISS Guido Carli Univ, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Shidler Coll Business, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] Univ S Carolina, Moore Sch Business, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS; VALUE CREATION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; BUSINESS MODEL; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; DEMAND HETEROGENEITY; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; USEFUL PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.5465/amr.2013.0097
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We focus on implications of an agreed upon yet little considered conclusion from our 2001 article-that resource value is determined outside the business-level resource-based view. Starting with this premise, we argue that knowledge accumulation from strategy research-especially actionable knowledge about effective versus ineffective managerial judgments-would be stimulated with more balanced attention not only to value capture for the firm but also to value creation for the firm's customers and, ultimately, consumers. To spur such wider attention, we offer an expanded boundary model that includes the demand side, business models, and business ecosystems within the strategy research "umbrella." Our proposal (1) extends what the current scholarly consensus might consider "normal" strategy research, (2) sets specific boundaries to guide future research, and (3) brings value creation for consumers to a more central position in the field. Viewing strategy from this broader perspective requires a shift in mindset, from focusing primarily on the firm to focusing more equally on the consumer, and from a primary emphasis on value capture to an equal emphasis on value creation. Such a shift faces obstacles but likely would spur innovative knowledge generation and result in a more dynamic, yet accumulative and prescriptive, strategy field.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 489
页数:19
相关论文
共 108 条
[71]  
2-T
[72]  
McGrath RG, 2005, HARVARD BUS REV, V83, P80
[73]   What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field [J].
Nag, Rajiv ;
Hambrick, Donald C. ;
Chen, Ming-Jer .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (09) :935-955
[74]   The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis [J].
Nerur, Sridhar P. ;
Rasheed, Abdul A. ;
Natarajan, Vivek .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (03) :319-336
[75]   The 'problem' of creating and capturing value [J].
Nickerson, Jackson A. ;
Silverman, Brian S. ;
Zenger, Todd R. .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2007, 5 (03) :211-225
[76]   Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field [J].
Oakes, LS ;
Townley, B ;
Cooper, DJ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1998, 43 (02) :257-292
[77]  
Penrose E. T., 1959, The theory of the growth of the firm
[78]  
Peteraf M.A., 2003, MANAG DECIS ECON, V24, P309, DOI [10.1002/mde.1126, DOI 10.1002/MDE.1126]
[79]   THE CORNERSTONES OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW [J].
PETERAF, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (03) :179-191