Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?

被引:28
作者
Tan, BJ [1 ]
Smith, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] Long Isl Jewish Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New Hyde Pk, NY 11040 USA
关键词
endopyelotomy; laparoscopy; minimally invasive; pyeloplasty; ureteral obstruction; ureteropelvic junction;
D O I
10.1097/00042307-200403000-00002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review To review factors that affect the success of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair and recent developments in minimally invasive procedures for the repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Recent findings Recent reports and studies further confirm earlier findings that the success rate of endopyelotomy is decreased when a crossing vessel is the primary cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, poor renal function and significant hydronephrosis. Various minimally invasive procedures have emerged recently for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. These include laparoscopic pyeloplasty, robotically assisted laparoscopic procedures, and percutaneous endopyeloplasty. These procedures offer potential advantages over conventional endopyelotomy, including better success rates in the presence of crossing vessels, wider caliber reconstruction of the ureteropelvic junction, and full-thickness healing with primary intent. Summary With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction available, the treatment choice for ureteropelvic junction obstruction must be based on several factors, including the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, the cost of the procedure, and the patient's choice.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 59
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases [J].
Jarrett, TW ;
Chan, DY ;
Charambura, TC ;
Fugita, O ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1253-1256
[22]   OUTCOME OF SECONDARY OPEN SURGICAL-PROCEDURE IN PATIENTS WHO FAILED PRIMARY ENDOPYELOTOMY [J].
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
ALBALA, DM ;
CLAYMAN, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 72 (02) :157-160
[23]   Endoluminal ultrasonography with reusable probe: Preliminary results [J].
Kumar, PVS ;
Joshi, HB ;
Timoney, AG ;
Keeley, FX .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (09) :667-671
[24]   Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy [J].
Lam, JS ;
Cooper, KL ;
Greene, TD ;
Gupta, M .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (06) :1107-1111
[25]   Retrograde Acucise® endopyelotomy:: Long-term results -: Reply by author [J].
Lechevallier, E .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (08) :579-580
[26]   Is 2-week duration sufficient for stenting in endopyelotomy? [J].
Mandhani, A ;
Kapoor, R ;
Zaman, W ;
Kumar, A ;
Bhandari, M ;
Gambhir, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :886-889
[27]   Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J].
Marcovich, R ;
Jacobson, AI ;
Aldana, JPA ;
Lee, DR ;
Smith, AD .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (01) :22-25
[28]   Antegrade endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children [J].
Netto, NR ;
Ikari, O ;
Esteves, SC ;
DAncona, CAL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 78 (04) :607-612
[29]   Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J].
Pardalidis, NP ;
Papatsoris, AG ;
Kosmaoglou, EV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) :1937-1940
[30]   Endoluminal ultrasonography before retrograde endopyelotomy: can the results match laparoscopic pyeloplasty? [J].
Parkin, J ;
Evans, S ;
Kumar, PVS ;
Timoney, AG ;
Keeley, FX .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 91 (04) :389-391