The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling

被引:349
作者
Krueger, Tobias [1 ]
Page, Trevor [2 ]
Hubacek, Klaus [3 ]
Smith, Laurence [4 ]
Hiscock, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ London, SOAS, Ctr Dev Environm & Policy, London WC1H 0PD, England
关键词
Subjectivity; Uncertainty; Expert system; Expert elicitation; Stakeholder; Participatory modelling; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL; POST-NORMAL SCIENCE; DECISION-SUPPORT; FUZZY-LOGIC; SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL-METHODS; LAND SUITABILITY; RISK-ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The inevitable though frequently informal use of expert opinion in modelling, the increasing number of models that incorporate formally expert opinion from a diverse range of experience and stakeholders, arguments for participatory modelling and analytic-deliberative-adaptive approaches to managing complex environmental problems, and an expanding but uneven literature prompt this critical review and analysis. Aims are to propose common definitions, identify and categorise existing concepts and practice, and provide a frame of reference and guidance for future environmental modelling. The extensive literature review and classification conducted demonstrate that a broad and inclusive definition of experts and expert opinion is both required and part of current practice. Thus an expert can be anyone with relevant and extensive or in-depth experience in relation to a topic of interest. The literature review also exposes informal model assumptions and modeller subjectivity, examines in detail the formal uses of expert opinion and expert systems, and critically analyses the main concepts of, and issues arising in, expert elicitation and the modelling of associated uncertainty. It is noted that model scrutiny and use of expert opinion in modelling will benefit from formal, systematic and transparent procedures that include as wide a range of stakeholders as possible. Enhanced awareness and utilisation of expert opinion is required for modelling that meets the informational needs of deliberative fora. These conclusions in no way diminish the importance of conventional science and scientific opinion but recognise the need for a paradigmatic shift from traditional ideals of unbiased and impartial experts towards unbiased processes of expert contestation and a plurality of expertise and eventually models. Priority must be given to the quality of the enquiry for those responsible for environmental management and policy formulation, and this review emphasises the role for science to maintain and enhance the rigour and formality of the information that informs decision making. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 18
页数:15
相关论文
共 187 条
[131]   Probabilistic uncertainty specification: Overview, elaboration techniques and their application to a mechanistic model of carbon flux [J].
O'Hagan, Anthony .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 36 :35-48
[132]   Comparison of three expert elicitation methods for logistic regression on predicting the presence of the threatened brush-tailed rock-wallaby Petrogale penicillata [J].
O'Leary, Rebecca A. ;
Choy, Samantha Low ;
Murray, Justine V. ;
Kynn, Mary ;
Denham, Robert ;
Martin, Tara G. ;
Mengersen, Kerrie .
ENVIRONMETRICS, 2009, 20 (04) :379-398
[133]   Valuing local knowledge as a source of expert data: Farmer engagement and the design of decision support systems [J].
Oliver, David M. ;
Fish, Rob D. ;
Winter, Michael ;
Hodgson, Chris J. ;
Heathwaite, A. Louise ;
Chadwick, Dave R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 36 :76-85
[134]   Development and testing of a risk indexing framework to determine field-scale critical source areas of faecal bacteria on grassland [J].
Oliver, David M. ;
Page, Trevor ;
Hodgson, Chris J. ;
Heathwaite, A. Louise ;
Chadwick, Dave R. ;
Fish, Rob D. ;
Winter, Michael .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (04) :503-512
[135]   Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems [J].
Olsson, P ;
Folke, C ;
Berkes, F .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (01) :75-90
[136]   Eliciting fuzzy distributions from experts for ranking conceptual risk model components [J].
Page, T. ;
Heathwaite, A. L. ;
Thompson, L. J. ;
Pope, L. ;
Willows, R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 36 :19-34
[137]   The implications of complexity for integrated resources management [J].
Pahl-Wostl, C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (05) :561-569
[138]   Using a self-organizing map to predict invasive species: sensitivity to data errors and a comparison with expert opinion [J].
Paini, Dean R. ;
Worner, Susan P. ;
Cook, David C. ;
De Barro, Paul J. ;
Thomas, Matthew B. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (02) :290-298
[139]   Incorporating expert opinion and fine-scale vegetation mapping into statistical models of faunal distribution [J].
Pearce, JL ;
Cherry, K ;
Drielsma, M ;
Ferrier, S ;
Whish, G .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2001, 38 (02) :412-424
[140]  
Pielke R. A., 2007, HONEST BROKER MAKING