The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling

被引:349
作者
Krueger, Tobias [1 ]
Page, Trevor [2 ]
Hubacek, Klaus [3 ]
Smith, Laurence [4 ]
Hiscock, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ London, SOAS, Ctr Dev Environm & Policy, London WC1H 0PD, England
关键词
Subjectivity; Uncertainty; Expert system; Expert elicitation; Stakeholder; Participatory modelling; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODEL; POST-NORMAL SCIENCE; DECISION-SUPPORT; FUZZY-LOGIC; SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL-METHODS; LAND SUITABILITY; RISK-ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The inevitable though frequently informal use of expert opinion in modelling, the increasing number of models that incorporate formally expert opinion from a diverse range of experience and stakeholders, arguments for participatory modelling and analytic-deliberative-adaptive approaches to managing complex environmental problems, and an expanding but uneven literature prompt this critical review and analysis. Aims are to propose common definitions, identify and categorise existing concepts and practice, and provide a frame of reference and guidance for future environmental modelling. The extensive literature review and classification conducted demonstrate that a broad and inclusive definition of experts and expert opinion is both required and part of current practice. Thus an expert can be anyone with relevant and extensive or in-depth experience in relation to a topic of interest. The literature review also exposes informal model assumptions and modeller subjectivity, examines in detail the formal uses of expert opinion and expert systems, and critically analyses the main concepts of, and issues arising in, expert elicitation and the modelling of associated uncertainty. It is noted that model scrutiny and use of expert opinion in modelling will benefit from formal, systematic and transparent procedures that include as wide a range of stakeholders as possible. Enhanced awareness and utilisation of expert opinion is required for modelling that meets the informational needs of deliberative fora. These conclusions in no way diminish the importance of conventional science and scientific opinion but recognise the need for a paradigmatic shift from traditional ideals of unbiased and impartial experts towards unbiased processes of expert contestation and a plurality of expertise and eventually models. Priority must be given to the quality of the enquiry for those responsible for environmental management and policy formulation, and this review emphasises the role for science to maintain and enhance the rigour and formality of the information that informs decision making. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 18
页数:15
相关论文
共 187 条
[91]  
Jasanoff S., 2003, SCI PUBL POLICY, V30, P157, DOI [DOI 10.3152/147154303781780542, 10.3152/147154303781780542]
[92]   Fuzzy-logic modeling of land suitability for hybrid poplar across the Prairie Provinces of Canada [J].
Joss, B. N. ;
Hall, R. J. ;
Sidders, D. M. ;
Keddy, T. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2008, 141 (1-3) :79-96
[93]  
Kahneman D., 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511809477, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477]
[94]   Indicators of environmentally sound land use in the humid tropics: The potential roles of expert opinion, knowledge engineering and knowledge discovery [J].
Kampichler, Christian ;
Hernandez-Daumas, Salvador ;
Ochoa-Gaona, Susana ;
Geissen, Violette ;
Huerta, Esperanza ;
de Jong, Ben .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2010, 10 (02) :320-329
[95]   Modelling ecological expertise for forest planning calculations-rationale, examples, and pitfalls [J].
Kangas, J ;
Leskinen, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 76 (02) :125-133
[96]   Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited: 1. Overcoming numerical artefacts [J].
Kavetski, D ;
Kuczera, G ;
Franks, SW .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 320 (1-2) :173-186
[97]   A context-dependent knowledge model for evaluation of regional environment [J].
Kawano, S ;
Huynh, VN ;
Ryoke, M ;
Nakamori, Y .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (03) :343-352
[98]   A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments [J].
Kloprogge, Penny ;
van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. ;
Petersen, Arthur C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (03) :289-301
[99]   The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure [J].
Knol, Anne B. ;
Slottje, Pauline ;
van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. ;
Lebret, Erik .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2010, 9
[100]   Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses [J].
Krueger, Tobias ;
Freer, Jim ;
Quinton, John N. ;
Macleod, Christopher J. A. ;
Bilotta, Gary S. ;
Brazier, Richard E. ;
Butler, Patricia ;
Haygarth, Philip M. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46