Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies

被引:78
作者
Lievens, F
Conway, JM
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management & Work & Org Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Cent Connecticut State Univ, Dept Psychol, New Britain, CT 06050 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1202
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study addresses 3 questions regarding assessment center construct validity: (a) Are assessment center ratings best thought of is reflecting dimension constructs (dimension model). exercises (exercise model). or a combination? (b) To A hat extent do dimensions or exercises account for variance? (c) Which design characteristics increase dimension variance? To this end, a large set of multitrait-multimethod studies (N = 34) were analyzed, showing that assessment center ratings were best represented (i.e., in terms of fit and admissible solutions) by a model with correlated dimensions and exercises specified Lis correlated uniquenesses. In this model. dimension variance equals exercise variance. Significantly more dimension variance was found when fewer dimensions were used and when assessors were psychologists. Use of behavioral checklists, a lower dimension-exercise ratio. and similar exercises also increased dimension variance.
引用
收藏
页码:1202 / 1222
页数:21
相关论文
共 88 条
[21]   Analysis and design of multitrait-multirater performance appraisal studies [J].
Conway, JM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1996, 22 (01) :139-162
[22]  
Coovert MD, 1997, J APPL PSYCHOL, V82, P271
[23]   ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION-MATRICES USING COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELS [J].
CUDECK, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (02) :317-327
[24]  
Donahue LM, 1997, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V12, P85
[25]   EFFECTS OF ASSESSOR TRAINING ON INFORMATION USE [J].
DUGAN, B .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (04) :743-748
[26]  
Fiske ST., 1991, SOC COGNITION
[28]  
FREDRICKS AJ, 1989, THESIS U NEBRASKA LI
[29]   NUMBER OF ASSESSMENT-CENTER DIMENSIONS AS A DETERMINANT OF ASSESSOR ACCURACY [J].
GAUGLER, BB ;
THORNTON, GC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (04) :611-618
[30]   ANALYSIS OF MULTITRAIT-MULTIRATER PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL DATA - COMPOSITE DIRECT-PRODUCT METHOD VERSUS CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
GOFFIN, RD ;
JACKSON, DN .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1992, 27 (03) :363-385