VALIDATION OF A MODERN ACTIVITY HAND SURVEY WITH RESPECT TO RELIABILITY, CONSTRUCT AND CRITERION VALIDITY

被引:16
作者
Alexander, M.
Franko, O. I.
Makhni, E. C.
Zurakowski, D.
Day, C. S.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Wrist survey; Functional outcomes; Hand function;
D O I
10.1177/1753193408093810
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study validates a novel, modern wrist and hand functional assessment: the Modern Activity Subjective Survey of 2007 (MASS07). [it total, 326 patients visiting an academic tertiary-care orthopaedic hand clinic (April 2006-April 2007) were recruited to complete the MASS07 questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) to assess construct validity, criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the MASS07. MASS07 correlated strongly with both PRWE (0.81) and DASH (0.85) even when adjusted for age, sex and history of hand problems (P < 0.001). MASS07 scores compared for 42 patients with repeated visits indicated no statistically significant difference between MASS07 scores at the patients' first and second clinic visit. We conclude that the newly constructed MASS07 instrument is valid and reliable with respect to the out-patient population with a wide spectrum of hand and wrist pathologies for fast and effective assessment of patient-reported hand function during modern daily activities.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 660
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[2]
Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Wright, JG ;
Katz, JN .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) :1038-1046
[3]
Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire [J].
Chung, KC ;
Pillsbury, MS ;
Walters, MR ;
Hayward, RA .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 23A (04) :575-587
[4]
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): Assessment of responsiveness to clinical change [J].
Chung, KC ;
Hamill, JB ;
Walters, MR ;
Hayward, RA .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 42 (06) :619-622
[5]
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
[6]
DeVellis RF., 2016, Scale development: Theory and applications
[7]
Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review [J].
Dowrick, AS ;
Gabbe, BJ ;
Williamson, OD ;
Cameron, PA .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2005, 36 (04) :468-476
[8]
Musculoskeletal function assessment instrument: Criterion and construct validity [J].
Engelberg, R ;
Martin, DP ;
Agel, J ;
Obremsky, W ;
Coronado, G ;
Swiontkowski, MF .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1996, 14 (02) :182-192
[9]
FEINSTEIN A.R., 1987, CLINIMETRICS
[10]
GUMMESSON C, 2006, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V18, P7, DOI DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-7-1