Accuracy of technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography and X-ray mammography in premenopausal women with suspected breast cancer

被引:17
作者
Lumachi, F
Ferretti, G
Povolato, M
Marzola, MC
Zucchetta, P
Geatti, O
Brandes, AA
Bui, F
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Dept Surg & Gastroenterol Sci, Endocrine Surg Unit, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Med Sci, Nucl Med Serv, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped, Div Med Oncol, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[4] Osped Riuniti, Nucl Med Serv, I-34100 Trieste, Italy
关键词
scintimammography; mammography; breast cancer; premenopausal women; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-001-0665-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography (SSM) and combined use of SSM and X-ray mammography (MG) in premenopausal patients with small (less than or equal to2 cm) suspicious breast lesions. Eighty-seven premenopausal women (median age 47 years, range 32-52) with breast lesions ranging from 4 to 20 mm in greatest diameter (median 12 mm) and detected by MG. underwent SSM prior to open breast biopsy. A planar camera and single-photon emission tomography (SPET) technique were used in 23 (26.4%) and 64 (73.6%) patients, respectively. At histological examination, 72 (82.8%) breast cancers (pT1a=3, pT1b=27, pT1c=42) and 15 (17.2%) benign masses were found. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of MG and SSM were 80.6% vs 80.6%, 60.0% vs 93.3% (P<0.05). 90.6% vs 98.3%, 39.1% vs 50.0% and 77.0% vs 82.8%. respectively. MG + SSM together had a sensitivity of 94.4% (P<0.05 vs SSM alone) and an accuracy of 82.8% for the detection of breast cancer. Tumours undetected by both MG and SSM were significantly (P<0.05) smaller than those correctly diagnosed. Patients with false-negative MG were younger (P<0.05) than those with tumours correctly detected, while SSM sensitivity was independent (P=NS) of age. In conclusion, in premenopausal patients with small breast lesions, the sensitivity of SSM and MG is similar (P=NS), whereas the specificity of SSM is significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of MG. Furthermore, the combination of MG and SSM offers significantly improved sensitivity and accuracy in comparison with the individual techniques, suggesting a complementary role of SSM in the detection of breast cancer in younger patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1776 / 1780
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: A diagnostic meta-analysis [J].
Hrung, JM ;
Sonnad, SS ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Langlotz, CP .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (07) :387-397
[12]   Comparative value of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and sonography in the diagnostic workup of breast masses [J].
Klaus, AJ ;
Klingensmith, WC ;
Parker, SH ;
Stavros, AT ;
Sutherland, JD ;
Aldrete, KD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1779-1783
[13]   THE POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
KOPANS, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (03) :521-526
[14]  
Kuhl CK, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V9, P187, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199902)9:2<187::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO
[15]  
2-2
[16]  
Lumachi F, 2001, ANTICANCER RES, V21, P2201
[17]   Usefulness of 99m-Tc-sestamibi scintimammography in suspected breast cancer and in axillary lymph node metastases detection [J].
Lumachi, F ;
Ferretti, G ;
Povolato, M ;
Marzola, MC ;
Zucchetta, P ;
Geatti, O ;
Bui, F ;
Brandes, AA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (03) :256-259
[18]   Breast cancer detection with 99m-Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration cytology: Comparative study in 64 surgically treated patients [J].
Lumachi, F ;
Marzola, MC ;
Zucchetta, P ;
Polistina, F ;
Cagnato, P ;
Favia, G ;
Bui, F .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 6 (06) :568-571
[19]  
Mekhmandarov S, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P86
[20]   Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: Are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? [J].
Orel, SG .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :5-7