Mapping landscape services: A case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands

被引:70
作者
Gulickx, M. M. C. [1 ]
Verburg, P. H. [2 ]
Stoorvogel, J. J. [1 ]
Kok, K. [1 ]
Veldkamp, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Soil Geog & Landscape Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AA Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Ecosystem services; Spatial characteristics; Indicators; Landscape functions; Multifunctionality; GIS; LAND-COVER CHANGE; VALUATION; SCALES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.005
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The wide variety of landscape services, e.g. food production, water quality, and recreation, necessitates the use of a wide range of data sources for their identification. Subsequently, an array of approaches is required to analyse and map differ different landscape services, which we have explored in this study. Approaches to identify and map four landscape services are illustrated for the municipalities Deurne and Asten in province Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands: wetland habitat, forest recreation, land-based animal husbandry, and recreation for hikers. The landscape services were identified through ground observations at 389 locations. Spatial indicators were used to identify and map the landscape services. Based on the ground observations, correlations between the landscape services and spatial characteristics (e.g. elevation, soil, road-type) were calculated within a neighbourhood with a radius of 0 m, 50 m, and 100 m. These correlations identified several site-specific indicators to map the landscape services. The accuracy of the landscape service maps created was assessed. The indicators proved to be adequately reliable for forest recreation and reasonably reliable for land-based animal husbandry and recreation for hikers. Only landscape service map forest recreation was shown to be highly accurate. The four landscape services rarely coincide, but within a 1 km radius it is apparent that some occur closer together. The approach that we have used is applicable for a wide range of different services and establishes a fundamental basis for determining their spatial variation. As such, it should provide vital information for policy makers and spatial planners. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 283
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
    de Groot, R. S.
    Alkemade, R.
    Braat, L.
    Hein, L.
    Willemen, L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 260 - 272
  • [12] de Vries F., 2008, NATL HYDROLOGISCH IN
  • [13] DeFries RS, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P249, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO
  • [14] 2
  • [15] Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management
    Egoh, Benis
    Reyers, Belinda
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Richardson, David M.
    Le Maitre, David C.
    van Jaarsveld, Albert S.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 127 (1-2) : 135 - 140
  • [16] Multifunctional landscapes - towards transdisciplinary research
    Fry, GLA
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2001, 57 (3-4) : 159 - 168
  • [17] Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland
    Gimona, Alessandro
    van der Horst, Dan
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (08) : 1255 - 1264
  • [18] Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs
    Haines-Young, Roy
    Potschin, Marion
    Kienast, Felix
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 39 - 53
  • [19] Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
    Hein, Lars
    van Koppen, Kris
    de Groot, Rudolf S.
    van Ierland, Ekko C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) : 209 - 228
  • [20] Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda
    Holmes, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2006, 22 (02) : 142 - 160