The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry

被引:147
作者
Kotecha, A [1 ]
White, ET [1 ]
Shewry, JM [1 ]
Garway-Heath, DF [1 ]
机构
[1] Moorfields Eye Hosp, Glaucoma Res Unit, London WC1V 2PD, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjo.2005.075580
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Aims: To establish the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with a prototype Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), to evaluate the effect of CCT and age on the agreement between IOP measured with the Pascal DCT and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to compare the interobserver and intraobserver variation of the DCT with the GAT. Methods: GAT and DCT IOP measurements were made on 130 eyes of 130 patients and agreement was assessed by means of Bland-Altman plots. The effect of CCT and age on GAT/DCT IOP differences was assessed by linear regression analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver variations for GAT and DCT were assessed in 100 eyes of 100 patients. Results: The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between GAT and DCT was -0.7 (-6.3 to 4.9) mmHg. GAT/DCT IOP differences increased with thicker CCT ( slope 0.017 mmHg/mu m, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.03, r(2) = 0.05, p = 0.01), and with greater age, slope 0.05 mmHg/ year ( 95% CI 0.012 to 0.084, r(2) = 0.05, p = 0.01). The intraobserver variability of GAT and DCT was 1.7 mmHg and 3.2 mmHg, respectively. The interobserver variability was (mean difference (95% limits of agreement)) 0.4 (-3.5 to 4.2) mmHg for GAT and 0.2 (-4.9 to 5.3) mmHg for DCT. Conclusions: GAT is significantly more affected than DCT by both CCT and subject age. The effect of age suggests an age related corneal biomechanical change that may induce measurement error additional to that of CCT. The prototype DCT has greater measurement variability than the GAT.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1575
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Bhan A, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P1389
[2]
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P744
[3]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]
Daxer A, 1998, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V39, P644
[5]
EHLERS N, 1975, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V53, P34
[6]
Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings [J].
Feltgen, N ;
Leifert, D ;
Funk, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (01) :85-87
[7]
Friedenwald JS., 1937, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V20, P985, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(37)90425-2, 10.1016/S0002-9394(37)90425-2]
[8]
GOLDMANN H, 1957, Ophthalmologica, V134, P221
[9]
Gordon MO, 2002, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V120, P714
[10]
Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer [J].
Gunvant, P ;
Baskaran, M ;
Vijaya, L ;
Joseph, IS ;
Watkins, RJ ;
Nallapothula, M ;
Broadway, DC ;
O'Leary, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 88 (04) :518-522