Brain stimulation for epilepsy: can scheduled or responsive neurostimulation stop seizures?

被引:150
作者
Morrell, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Med, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
关键词
brain stimulation; device; epilepsy; therapy;
D O I
10.1097/01.wco.0000218233.60217.84
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of review Scheduled and responsive direct brain stimulation may be an effective and safe therapy for medically intractable epilepsy. Recent findings Scheduled stimulation (open loop) has been provided via electrodes implanted in thalamic nuclei, the cerebellum and the hippocampus using devices commercially available for treatment of tremor and Parkinson's disease. Small pilot trials suggest that seizure frequency is reduced in some patients with intractable epilepsy. Responsive stimulation requires systems that detect abnormal electrographic activity and provide stimulation (closed loop). Studies in inpatients and outpatients suggest that abnormal electrographic discharges can be detected before there is evolution into a clinical seizure, and that focal stimulation of the epileptogenic region terminates electrographic seizures and reduces the frequency of clinically evident seizures. Summary Direct brain stimulation appears to be safe and may be efficacious in treating medically intractable epilepsy. The optimal location (deep brain or cortical) and characteristics of the stimulation (frequency, current, duration), and whether stimulation should be focal or responsive are still to be determined. If ongoing studies of a deep brain stimulator and of a cranially implanted responsive neurostimulator demonstrate effectiveness, then neurostimulation may become available as adjunctive therapy for medically intractable epilepsy.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 168
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1954, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC
[2]   Surgical technique for the CLARION® Cochlear Implant [J].
Balkany, TJ ;
Cohen, NL ;
Gantz, BJ .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04) :27-30
[3]  
Chabardès S, 2002, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V4, pS83
[4]   Electrophysiological effects and clinical results of direct brain stimulation for intractable epilepsy [J].
Chkhenkeli, SA ;
Sramka, M ;
Lortkipanidze, GS ;
Rakviashvili, TN ;
Bregvadze, ES ;
Magalashvili, GE ;
Gagoshidze, TS ;
Chkhenkeli, IS .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 106 (04) :318-329
[5]  
Cooper I S, 1977, Neurosurgery, V1, P203
[6]   PERSISTENCE OF KINDLING - EFFECT OF PARTIAL KINDLING, RETENTION INTERVAL, KINDLING SITE, AND STIMULATION PARAMETERS [J].
DENNISON, Z ;
TESKEY, GC ;
CAIN, DP .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1995, 21 (03) :171-182
[7]   PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PILOT-STUDY OF CENTROMEDIAN THALAMIC-STIMULATION IN TREATMENT OF INTRACTABLE SEIZURES [J].
FISHER, RS ;
UEMATSU, S ;
KRAUSS, GL ;
CYSYK, BJ ;
MCPHERSON, R ;
LESER, RP ;
GORDON, B ;
SCHWERDT, P ;
RISE, M .
EPILEPSIA, 1992, 33 (05) :841-851
[8]   Implantation of a closed-loop stimulation in the management of medically refractory focal epilepsy - A technical note [J].
Fountas, KN ;
Smith, JR ;
Murro, AM ;
Politsky, J ;
Park, YD ;
Jenkins, PD .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 83 (04) :153-158
[9]   A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CHRONIC VAGUS NERVE-STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF MEDICALLY INTRACTABLE SEIZURES [J].
GEORGE, R ;
SONNEN, A ;
UPTON, A ;
SALINSKY, M ;
RISTANOVIC, R ;
BERGEN, D ;
MIRZA, W ;
ROSENFELD, W ;
NARITOKU, D ;
MANONESPAILLAT, R ;
BAROLAT, G ;
WILLIS, J ;
STEFAN, H ;
TREIG, T ;
HUFNAGEL, A ;
KUZNIECKY, R ;
UTHMAN, B ;
WILDER, BJ ;
AUGUSTINSSON, L ;
BENMENACHEM, E ;
RAMSAY, E ;
WERNICKE, JF ;
TARVER, WB .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :224-230
[10]   Preemptive low-frequency stimulation decreases the incidence of amygdala-kindled seizures [J].
Goodman, JH ;
Berger, RE ;
Tcheng, TK .
EPILEPSIA, 2005, 46 (01) :1-7