What makes companies pursue an Open Science strategy?

被引:65
作者
Simeth, Markus [1 ]
Raffo, Julio D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Coll Management, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Paris 13, Ctr Econ Univ Paris Nord CEPN, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France
关键词
R&D; Industrial science; Knowledge disclosure; University-industry collaboration; Open Innovation; Reciprocity; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; INDUSTRY; FIRMS; SCIENTISTS; PATENT; BIOTECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Whereas recent scholarly research has provided many insights about universities engaging in commercial activities, there is still little empirical evidence regarding the opposite phenomenon of companies disseminating scientific knowledge. Our paper aims to fill this gap and explores the motivations of firms that disclose research outcomes in a scientific format. Besides considering a dimension internal to the firm, we focus particularly on knowledge sourcing from academic institutions and the appropriability regime. We conduct an econometric analysis with firm-level data from the fourth edition of the French innovation survey (CIS) and matched scientific publications for a sample of 2512 R&D performing firms from all manufacturing sectors. This analysis provides evidence that firms are more likely to adopt academic principles if they need to access scientific knowledge that is considered important for their innovation development, whereas the mere existence of collaborative links with academic institutions is not a strong determinant. Furthermore, the results suggest that the inclination of firms to publish is sensitive to the level of knowledge spillovers in a sector and the effectiveness of legal appropriation instruments. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1531 / 1543
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
[21]   Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (397) :569-596
[22]  
Crpon Bruno., 1998, EC INNOVATION NEW TE, V7, P115, DOI [10.1080/10438599800000031, DOI 10.1080/10438599800000031]
[23]   THE PHD FACTORY [J].
Cyranoski, David ;
Gilbert, Natasha ;
Ledford, Heidi ;
Nayar, Anjali ;
Yahia, Mohammed .
NATURE, 2011, 472 (7343) :276-279
[24]  
CZARNITZKI D, 2011, 11009 ZEW
[25]   How open is innovation? [J].
Dahlander, Linus ;
Gann, David M. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) :699-709
[26]  
DASGUPTA P, 1994, RES POLICY, V23, P487
[27]   STRATEGIC SPILLOVERS IN PATENT RACES [J].
DEFRAJA, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1993, 11 (01) :139-146
[28]   Corporate science in the patent system: An analysis of the semiconductor technology [J].
Della Malva, Antonio ;
Hussinger, Katrin .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 84 (01) :118-135
[29]   The Impact of Founders' Professional-Education Background on the Adoption of Open Science by For-Profit Biotechnology Firms [J].
Ding, Waverly W. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (02) :257-273
[30]  
EC (European Commission), 2003, MOD CONTR 6 FRAM PRO