A novel form of resistance in rice to the angiosperm parasite Striga hermonthica

被引:116
作者
Gurney, AL [1 ]
Slate, J [1 ]
Press, MC [1 ]
Scholes, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
backcross inbred line; Oryza sativa; quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis; resistance; Striga hermonthica;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01560.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The root hemiparasitic weed Striga hermonthica is a serious constraint to grain production of economically important cereals in sub-Saharan Africa. Breeding for parasite resistance in cereals is widely recognized as the most sustainable form of long-term control; however, advances have been limited owing to a lack of cereal germplasm demonstrating postattachment resistance to Striga. Here, we identify a cultivar of rice (Nipponbare) that exhibits strong postattachment resistance to S. hermonthica; the parasite penetrates the host root cortex but does not form parasite-host xylem-xylem connections. In order to identify the genomic regions contributing to this resistance, a mapping population of backcross inbred lines between the resistant (Nipponbare) and susceptible (Kasalath) parents were evaluated for resistance to S. hermonthica. Composite interval mapping located seven putative quantitative trait loci (QTL) explaining 31% of the overall phenotypic variance; a second, independent, screen confirmed four of these QTL. Relative to the parental lines, allelic substitutions at these QTL altered the phenotype by at least 0.5 of a phenotypic standard deviation. Thus, they should be regarded as major genes and are likely to be useful in breeding programmes to enhance host resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
FROST DL, 1997, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V20, P4873
[12]   A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp japonica) [J].
Goff, SA ;
Ricke, D ;
Lan, TH ;
Presting, G ;
Wang, RL ;
Dunn, M ;
Glazebrook, J ;
Sessions, A ;
Oeller, P ;
Varma, H ;
Hadley, D ;
Hutchinson, D ;
Martin, C ;
Katagiri, F ;
Lange, BM ;
Moughamer, T ;
Xia, Y ;
Budworth, P ;
Zhong, JP ;
Miguel, T ;
Paszkowski, U ;
Zhang, SP ;
Colbert, M ;
Sun, WL ;
Chen, LL ;
Cooper, B ;
Park, S ;
Wood, TC ;
Mao, L ;
Quail, P ;
Wing, R ;
Dean, R ;
Yu, YS ;
Zharkikh, A ;
Shen, R ;
Sahasrabudhe, S ;
Thomas, A ;
Cannings, R ;
Gutin, A ;
Pruss, D ;
Reid, J ;
Tavtigian, S ;
Mitchell, J ;
Eldredge, G ;
Scholl, T ;
Miller, RM ;
Bhatnagar, S ;
Adey, N ;
Rubano, T ;
Tusneem, N .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5565) :92-100
[13]   The differential susceptibility of vetch (Vicia spp.) to Orobanche aegyptiaca:: Anatomical studies [J].
Goldwasser, Y ;
Plakhine, D ;
Kleifeld, Y ;
Zamski, E ;
Rubin, B .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2000, 85 (02) :257-262
[14]   NRSA-1:: a resistance gene homolog expressed in roots of non-host plants following parasitism by Striga asiatica (witchweed) [J].
Gowda, BS ;
Riopel, JL ;
Timko, MP .
PLANT JOURNAL, 1999, 20 (02) :217-230
[15]   Novel sources of resistance to Striga hermonthica in Tripsacum dactyloides, a wild relative of maize [J].
Gurney, AL ;
Grimanelli, D ;
Kanampiu, F ;
Hoisington, D ;
Scholes, JD ;
Press, MC .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2003, 160 (03) :557-568
[16]   Do maize cultivars demonstrate tolerance to the parasitic weed Striga asiatica ? [J].
Gurney, AL ;
Taylor, A ;
Mbwaga, A ;
Scholes, JD ;
Press, MC .
WEED RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (04) :299-306
[17]   Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica [J].
Gurney, AL ;
Press, MC ;
Scholes, JD .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1999, 143 (03) :573-580
[18]   Genomic regions influencing resistance to the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica in two recombinant inbred populations of sorghum [J].
Haussmann, BIG ;
Hess, DE ;
Omanya, GO ;
Folkertsma, RT ;
Reddy, BVS ;
Kayentao, M ;
Welz, HG ;
Geiger, HH .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2004, 109 (05) :1005-1016
[19]  
HEWITT E. J., 1966, SAND WATER CULTURE M
[20]   Primary haustorial development of Striga asiatica on host and nonhost species [J].
Hood, ME ;
Condon, JM ;
Timko, MP ;
Riopel, JL .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 88 (01) :70-75