Will a supplier benefit from sharing good information with a retailer?

被引:39
作者
Choi, Tsan-Ming [1 ]
Li, Jian [2 ]
Wei, Ying [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Business Div, Inst Text & Clothing, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain management; Forecast updating; Returns policy; CHAIN COORDINATION; INVENTORY PROBLEM; DEMAND FORECAST; QUICK RESPONSE; CONTRACTS; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.011
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Information sharing has been known to be crucial in supply chain management. Prior empirical finding reveals that suppliers in practice tend to help their trading partners improve forecast accuracy. This paper examines this issue and explores the up-down (from an upstream supplier to a downstream retailer) strategic information sharing issues in a two-echelon supply chain. We first model a supply chain with forecast updating and returns policy. The forecast updating scheme adopts the Bayesian approach with unknown mean and unknown variance. We then proceed to analytically explore the effects of forecast updating on the supplier and the retailer. Our analysis has revealed that: 1. Demand information with low relevance can lead to a loss to the retailer. 2. In the absence of returns policy, the supplier has an incentive to provide "bad information" which may be harmful to the retailer. 3. The supplier will provide "good information" to the retailer only under the returns policy. 4. With up-down information sharing, win-win coordination can be achieved by using a proper returns policy. Many of these results can supplement and challenge the prior research findings that supplier has good incentive to help retailers in improving forecast. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
Mukhopadhyay S.K., 2009, INT J PROD ECON, V134, P424
[22]   A dynamic model for optimal design quality and return policies [J].
Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. ;
Setaputra, Robert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 180 (03) :1144-1154
[23]  
Murray Jr G.R., 1966, Manag. Sci., V12, P785
[24]  
Pasternack B., 1985, Marketing Sci, V4, P166, DOI [10.1287/mksc.4.2.166, DOI 10.1287/MKSC.4.2.166]
[25]   Advance Selling by a Newsvendor Retailer [J].
Prasad, Ashutosh ;
Stecke, Kathryn E. ;
Zhao, Xuying .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 20 (01) :129-142
[26]   Impact of demand correlation on the value of and incentives for information sharing in a supply chain [J].
Raghunathan, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 146 (03) :634-649
[27]   BAYES SOLUTIONS OF THE STATISTICAL INVENTORY PROBLEM [J].
SCARF, H .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1959, 30 (02) :490-508
[28]   The benefits of advance booking discount programs: Model and analysis [J].
Tang, CS ;
Rajaram, K ;
Alptekinoglu, A ;
Ou, JH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (04) :465-478
[29]   Does a Manufacturer Benefit from Selling to a Better-Forecasting Retailer? [J].
Taylor, Terry A. ;
Xiao, Wenqiang .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (09) :1584-1598
[30]   Revisiting the note on supply chain integration in vendor-managed inventory [J].
Wang, Wan-Tsu ;
Wee, Hui-Ming ;
Tsao, H. -S. Jacob .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 48 (02) :419-420