Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy

被引:154
作者
Becker, Sascha O. [2 ]
Egger, Peter H. [1 ]
von Ehrlich, Maximilian [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, KOF, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
EU regional policy; Regional growth; Generalized propensity score estimation; Quasi-randomized experiment; PROPENSITY SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) provides grants to disadvantaged regions of member states from two pools, the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund. The main goal of the associated transfers is to facilitate convergence of poor regions (in terms of per-capita income) to the EU average. We use data at the NUTS3 level from the last two EU budgetary periods (1994-1999 and 2000-2006) and generalized propensity score estimation to analyze to which extent the goal of fostering growth in the target regions was achieved with the funds provided and whether or not more transfers generated stronger growth effects. We find that, overall, EU transfers enable faster growth in the recipient regions as intended, but we estimate that in 36% of the recipient regions the transfer intensity exceeds the aggregate efficiency maximizing level and in 18% of the regions a reduction of transfers would not even reduce their growth. We conclude that some reallocation of the funds across target regions would lead to higher aggregate growth in the EU and could generate even faster convergence than the current scheme does. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 668
页数:21
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   ON THE THEORY OF OPTIMAL INVESTMENT DECISION [J].
HIRSHLEIFER, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1958, 66 (04) :329-352
[12]   Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score [J].
Imai, K ;
van Dyk, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (467) :854-866
[13]   The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions [J].
Imbens, GW .
BIOMETRIKA, 2000, 87 (03) :706-710
[14]  
Kluve J., J ROYAL S A IN PRESS
[15]   Public policies, regional inequalities and growth [J].
Martin, P .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1999, 73 (01) :85-105
[16]  
Mohl P., 2008, ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1328869
[17]   THE ALLOCATION OF TALENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR GROWTH [J].
MURPHY, KM ;
SHLEIFER, A ;
VISHNY, RW .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1991, 106 (02) :503-530
[18]   THE CENTRAL ROLE OF THE PROPENSITY SCORE IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES FOR CAUSAL EFFECTS [J].
ROSENBAUM, PR ;
RUBIN, DB .
BIOMETRIKA, 1983, 70 (01) :41-55
[19]  
Sachs JD, 2004, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P117
[20]   A METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE DISTRIBUTION OF POWER IN A COMMITTEE SYSTEM [J].
Shapley, L. S. ;
Shubik, Martin .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1954, 48 (03) :787-792