Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory

被引:44
作者
Taylor, Jason R. [1 ]
Henson, Richard N. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Remember/know; Source memory; Context; Episodic; Priming; DUAL-PROCESS MODEL; DECISION-PROCESSES; INFORMATION; JUDGMENT; ITEM; HIPPOCAMPUS; ATTENTION; FEELINGS; REMEMBER; ACCOUNT;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.029
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We begin with a theoretical overview of the concepts of recollection and familiarity, focusing, in the spirit of this special issue, on the important contributions made by Andrew Mayes. In particular, we discuss the issue of when the generation of semantically-related information in response to a retrieval cue might be experienced as recollection rather than familiarity. We then report a series of experiments in which two different types of masked prime, presented immediately prior to the test cue in a recognition memory paradigm, produced opposite effects on Remember vs. Know judgments. More specifically, primes that were conceptually related to the test item increased the incidence of Remember judgments, though only when intermixed with repetition primes (which increased the incidence of Know judgments instead, as in prior studies). One possible explanation-that the fluency of retrieval of item-context associations can be experienced as recollection, even when the source of that fluency is unknown-is counter to conventional views of recollection and familiarity, though it was anticipated by Andrew in his writings nearly two decades ago. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3027 / 3040
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]   APPRECIATION OF GENERATE-RECOGNIZE THEORY OF RECALL [J].
WATKINS, MJ ;
GARDINER, JM .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1979, 18 (06) :687-704
[52]   The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity [J].
Whittlesea, BWA ;
Williams, LD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (01) :14-33
[53]   Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity [J].
Whittlesea, BWA ;
Williams, LD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1998, 98 (2-3) :141-165
[54]   A Continuous Dual-Process Model of Remember/Know Judgments [J].
Wixted, John T. ;
Mickes, Laura .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (04) :1025-1054
[55]   Event-related Potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory [J].
Woollams, Anna M. ;
Taylor, Jason R. ;
Karayanidis, Frini ;
Henson, Richard N. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (06) :1114-1129
[56]   The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research [J].
Yonelinas, AP .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 46 (03) :441-517
[57]   Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity [J].
Yonelinas, AP .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (06) :747-763
[58]   Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection [J].
Yonelinas, AP ;
Jacoby, LL .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 1996, 5 (1-2) :131-141
[59]   THE RELATION BETWEEN REMEMBERING AND KNOWING AS BASES FOR RECOGNITION - EFFECTS OF SIZE CONGRUENCY [J].
YONELINAS, AP ;
JACOBY, LL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (05) :622-643