Prediction of lean yield in yearling bulls using real-time ultrasound

被引:28
作者
Bergen, RD
McKinnon, JJ
Christensen, DA
Kohle, N
机构
[1] UNIV SASKATCHEWAN,DEPT ANIM & POULTRY SCI,SASKATOON,SK S7N 5B5,CANADA
[2] SASKATCHEWAN AGR & FOOD,SUSTAINABLE PROD BRANCH,RURAL SERV CTR,SASKATOON,SK S7N 5B5,CANADA
关键词
real-time ultrasound; performance testing; beef bulls; carcass traits;
D O I
10.4141/cjas96-046
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A study was undertaken to determine the repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound measurements taken on yearling bulls and to assess the value of these live measurements to predict lean yield. Ultrasonic fat depth and 1. dorsi area were measured on 616 yearling bulls prior to slaughter. Corresponding carcass measurements were obtained through the Agriculture Canada Blue Tag Program. Carcass side lean (LEANYIELD) was extrapolated from the lean content of the seven-bone rib section from the carcasses of 41 Angus and 41 Charolais bulls. Stepwise multiple regression used live (USFAT and USREA) measurements to predict LEANYIELD. Repeatability (SER) and accuracy (SEP) statistics for USFAT were 0.8 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. The corresponding results for USREA were SER = 4.3 cm(2) and SEP = 7.8 cm(2). The ultrasound lean yield (USLEAN) prediction equation was: USLEAN = 599.2 - (9.5 x USFAT) + (1.1 x USREA); R(2) = 0.73, RSD = 17.9 g kg(-1). Results indicated that LEANYIELD was predicted better by USLEAN (SEP = 18.0 g kg(-1)) than by BTLEAN (SEP = 22.6 g kg(-1)). Results from a second group of dissected bulls (n = 110) confirmed that ultrasound can predict LEANYIELD as effectively as carcass measurements (SEP = 22.8 and 22.6 g kg(-1) for USLEAN AND BTLEAN) in young breeding bulls in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 311
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
ARNOLD JW, 1991, J ANIM SCI, V69, P985
[2]  
BERGEN R, 1995, CAN J ANIM SCI, V75
[3]   THE REPEATABILITY AND ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND IN MEASURING BACKFAT OF CATTLE [J].
BRETHOUR, JR .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (04) :1039-1044
[4]  
BUCKLEY BA, 1990, J ANIM SCI, V68, P3109
[5]  
FAULKNER DB, 1990, J ANIM SCI, V68, P604
[6]  
Hankins O. G., 1946, U S DEPT AGRIC TECH BULL, V926, P1
[7]   COMPARISON OF LIVE AND CARCASS EQUATIONS PREDICTING PERCENTAGE OF CUTABILITY, RETAIL PRODUCT WEIGHT, AND TRIMMABLE FAT IN BEEF-CATTLE [J].
HERRING, WO ;
WILLIAMS, SE ;
BERTRAND, JK ;
BENYSHEK, LL ;
MILLER, DC .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1994, 72 (05) :1107-1118
[8]   EVALUATION OF MACHINE, TECHNICIAN, AND INTERPRETER EFFECTS ON ULTRASONIC MEASURES OF BACKFAT AND LONGISSIMUS MUSCLE AREA IN BEEF-CATTLE [J].
HERRING, WO ;
MILLER, DC ;
BERTRAND, JK ;
BENYSHEK, LL .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1994, 72 (09) :2216-2226
[9]   THE USE OF CARCASS CUTS TO PREDICT BEEF CARCASS COMPOSITION - A RESEARCH TECHNIQUE [J].
JOHNSON, ER ;
CHARLES, DD .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1981, 32 (06) :987-997
[10]   THE PREDICTION OF BEEF CARCASS LEAN CONTENT BY AN ELECTRONIC PROBE, A VISUAL SCORING SYSTEM AND CARCASS MEASUREMENTS [J].
JONES, SDM ;
TONG, AKW ;
ROBERTSON, WM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1989, 69 (03) :641-648