When Hierarchy Wins: Evidence From the National Basketball Association

被引:104
作者
Halevy, Nir [1 ]
Chou, Eileen Y. [2 ]
Galinsky, Adam D. [2 ]
Murnighan, J. Keith [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
hierarchy; groups; pay dispersion; participation; cooperation; performance; PERFORMANCE; POWER; INDIVIDUALS; DISPERSION; KNOWLEDGE; DIFFERENTIATION; JUSTIFICATION; LEADERSHIP; ORIGINS; TOO;
D O I
10.1177/1948550611424225
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Past research on pay dispersion has found that hierarchy hurts commitment, cooperation, and performance. In contrast, functional theories of social hierarchy propose that hierarchy can facilitate coordination and performance. We investigated the effects of hierarchical differentiation using a sample of professional basketball teams from the National Basketball Association (NBA). Analyses of archival data revealed that hierarchical differentiation in pay and participation enhanced team performance by facilitating intragroup coordination and cooperation. The data provide the basis for a theoretical analysis which suggests that hierarchy is particularly beneficial for procedurally interdependent tasks (e.g., basketball) but can harm team performance for procedurally independent tasks (e.g., baseball; Bloom, 1999). Overall, the current data indicate that team structure (hierarchy) affects team outcomes (performance) through team processes (cooperation and coordination). Thus, under certain conditions, hierarchical differentiation helps lead groups to victory.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 406
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[2]   The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Brown, Courtney E. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 30, 2010, 30 :55-89
[3]   THE SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONS AND INEQUALITY [J].
BARON, JN ;
PFEFFER, J .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1994, 57 (03) :190-209
[4]   Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association [J].
Berman, SL ;
Down, J ;
Hill, CWL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (01) :13-31
[5]   The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations [J].
Bloom, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (01) :25-40
[6]   STATUS PROCESSES IN ENDURING WORK GROUPS [J].
COHEN, BP ;
ZHOU, XG .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 56 (02) :179-188
[7]   The Strong Situation Hypothesis [J].
Cooper, William H. ;
Withey, Michael J. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 13 (01) :62-72
[8]   Social status as a cue for tacit coordination [J].
de Kwaadsteniet, Erik W. ;
van Dijk, Eric .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (03) :515-524
[9]   Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals [J].
Edmondson, AC ;
Bohmer, RM ;
Pisano, GP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2001, 46 (04) :685-716
[10]   THE 4 ELEMENTARY FORMS OF SOCIALITY - FRAMEWORK FOR A UNIFIED THEORY OF SOCIAL-RELATIONS [J].
FISKE, AP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (04) :689-723