Goal orientation profiles and task performance growth trajectories

被引:13
作者
Yeo, Gillian B. [1 ]
Sorbello, Tamma [1 ]
Koy, Annette [1 ]
Smillie, Luke D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ London, London, England
关键词
Goal orientation; Task performance; Growth trajectories;
D O I
10.1007/s11031-008-9099-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Goal orientation theories were used to generate predictions regarding the moderating effect of goal orientation profiles on task performance growth trajectories. Participants were given multiple trials of practice on an air traffic control task. Analyses were conducted using growth curve modeling. As expected, individuals with high performance-approach orientation improved their task performance scores faster than their counterparts. The interaction between mastery and performance-avoid orientations moderated the performance growth curve such that individuals with high mastery and low performance-avoid orientation improved their performance at the fastest rate. The interaction between performance-approach and performance-avoid orientations also moderated the performance growth curve. Individuals with low performance-approach and high performance-avoid orientation improved their performance at the slowest rate. These findings contribute to theory and practice by elucidating how various combinations of goal orientations influence the rate of skill acquisition.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 309
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   Longitudinal data analysis - Applications of random coefficient modeling to leadership research [J].
Ployhart, RE ;
Holtz, BC ;
Bliese, PD .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2002, 13 (04) :455-486
[52]   Relating goal orientation to self-regulatory processes: A longitudinal field test [J].
Radosevich, DJ ;
Vaidyanathan, VT ;
Yeo, SY ;
Radosevich, DM .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 29 (03) :207-229
[53]   Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes [J].
Schmidt, AM ;
Ford, JK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (02) :405-429
[54]   ACADEMIC GOAL ORIENTATIONS AND STUDENT CLASSROOM ACHIEVEMENT [J].
SCHRAW, G ;
HORN, C ;
THORNDIKECHRIST, T ;
BRUNING, R .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 20 (03) :359-368
[55]   Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures [J].
Seijts, GH ;
Latham, GP ;
Tasa, K ;
Latham, BW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (02) :227-239
[56]   Benefits of all work and no play: The relationship between neuroticism and performance as a function of resource allocation [J].
Smillie, LD ;
Yeo, GB ;
Furnham, AF ;
Jackson, CJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (01) :139-155
[57]  
Snijders T. A., 2012, MULTILEVEL ANAL INTR
[58]  
SPENCE JT, 1983, ACHIEVEMENT ACHIEVEM, P8
[59]   Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance [J].
Steele-Johnson, D ;
Beauregard, RS ;
Hoover, PB ;
Schmidt, AM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) :724-738
[60]   Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in self-regulation and performance on a complex task [J].
Tabernero, C ;
Wood, RE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1999, 78 (02) :104-127