Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations

被引:26
作者
Lea, Simon C. [1 ]
Felver, Bernhard [1 ]
Landini, Gabriel [1 ]
Walmsley, A. Damien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Dent, Birmingham B4 6NN, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
performance; periodontology; ultrasonic scaler; vibration; DISPLACEMENT AMPLITUDE; SONIC SCALER; IN-VITRO; SUBSTANCE REMOVAL; TIP; INSTRUMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; INSERTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01339.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Lea SC, Felver B, Landini G, Walmsley AD. Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01339.x. It is stated that the oscillation patterns of dental ultrasonic scalers are dependent upon whether the instrument is of a magnetostrictive or piezoelectric design. These patterns are then linked to differences in root surface debridement in vitro. Piezoelectric (A, P) and magnetostrictive (Slimline, TFI-3) ultrasonic scalers (three of each) were evaluated, loaded (100 g/200 g) and unloaded with a 3D laser vibrometer. Loads were applied to the probe tips via teeth mounted in a load-measuring device. Elliptical motion was demonstrated for all probes under loaded and unloaded conditions. Loading flattened the elliptical motion along the length of the probe. Unloaded, Slimline tip 1 was significantly different to tips 2 and 3 (p < 0.0001). There were no differences between the A-tips (p > 0.207). All TFI-3 tips were different to each other (p < 0.0001). P-tips 1 and 2 were different to each other (p=0.046). Loaded, Slimline tips were different to each other (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the P probes (p > 0.867). Generator power increased all Slimline and P tip vibrations (p < 0.0001). Probe oscillation patterns are independent of ultrasound production mechanism and are dependent upon probe shape and generator power. Loaded probes oscillated with an elliptical pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ARABACI T, 2006, INT J DENT HYGIENE, V5, P2
[2]  
Drisko C L, 2000, J Periodontol, V71, P1792
[3]   The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro [J].
Flemmig, TF ;
Petersilka, GJ ;
Mehl, A ;
Hickel, R ;
Klaiber, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 25 (02) :158-163
[4]   PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION INTO THE PERFORMANCE OF A SONIC SCALER [J].
GANKERSEER, EJ ;
WALMSLEY, AD .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1987, 58 (11) :780-784
[5]   The use of a linear oscillating device in periodontal treatment: a review [J].
Guentsch, Arndt ;
Preshaw, Philip M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 (06) :514-524
[6]  
JACOBSON L, 1994, SCAND J DENT RES, V102, P156
[7]   Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study [J].
Jepsen, S ;
Ayna, M ;
Hedderich, J ;
Eberhard, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 31 (11) :1003-1006
[8]   A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo [J].
Kawashima, H. ;
Sato, S. ;
Kishida, M. ;
Ito, K. .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (01) :90-95
[9]  
Kocher T, 1997, INT J PERIODONT REST, V17, P393
[10]  
Lea SC, 2006, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V33, P37, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00861.x