GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States

被引:54
作者
Cheung, RJ [1 ]
Ortiz, D [1 ]
DiMarino, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/ge.1999.v50.99615
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient infection from contaminated gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes can generally be attributed to failure to follow appropriate reprocessing guidelines. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration recommended a 45-minute exposure of GI endoscopes to 2.4% glutaraldehyde solutions heated to 25 degrees C. Simultaneously, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates endorsed a reprocessing guideline that emphasized manual precleaning and recommended a 20-minute exposure to a 2.4% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature. Since then, little information has become available regarding actual reprocessing practices in the United States. Methods: A previously developed questionnaire regarding endoscopic disinfection practices was mailed to randomly selected members of the ASGE. Results: The survey was sent to 730 members and 294 responded (40.3%). Appropriate manual cleaning (suctioning detergent through the accessory channel and brushing the channel and valves) is performed by 90.7% of respondents; 69.9% then use automated reprocessors for disinfection or sterilization. Glutaraldehyde is the most widely used chemical disinfectant; 85.3% use glutaraldehyde as one of their primary disinfectants. The most commonly used disinfection time with 2.4% glutaraldehyde is 20 minutes (83.9%) followed by 45 minutes (11.4%). Only 23.8% of users of 2.4% glutaraldehyde heat their solution; 59.6% of centers test disinfectant concentration daily or more frequently; 74.0% sterilize nondisposable forceps before use; 29.2% of centers reuse disposable endoscopic accessories (which are more frequently disinfected rather than sterilized). Twelve respondents reported cases of endoscopic cross Infection. Conclusions: A significant minority of endoscopy centers still do not completely conform to recent ASGE, American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates guidelines on disinfection, and they may not be appropriately disinfecting GI endoscopes. Rigid adherence to recommended guidelines is strongly encouraged to ensure patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   APIC GUIDELINE FOR INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL IN FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPY [J].
MARTIN, MA ;
REICHELDERFER, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1994, 22 (01) :19-38
[22]   Advantages and limitations of automatic flexible endoscope reprocessors [J].
Muscarella, LF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1996, 24 (04) :304-309
[23]   Italian national survey of digestive endoscopy disinfection procedures [J].
Orsi, GB ;
Filocamo, A ;
Di Stefano, L ;
Tittobello, A .
ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 29 (08) :732-740
[24]   VARIABILITY IN REPROCESSING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC ENDOSCOPES IN MASSACHUSETTS HOSPITALS [J].
REYNOLDS, CD ;
RHINEHART, E ;
DREYER, P ;
GOLDMANN, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1992, 20 (06) :283-290
[25]  
RUSSELL AD, 1994, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V15, P724
[26]  
RUTALA WA, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P231
[27]  
RUTALA WA, 1991, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V12, P282
[28]  
SCHLIESSLER KH, 1980, LANCET, V2, P1246
[29]   TRANSMISSION OF INFECTION BY GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY AND BRONCHOSCOPY [J].
SPACH, DH ;
SILVERSTEIN, FE ;
STAMM, WE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (02) :117-128
[30]   PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA AND ENTEROBACTERIACEAE BACTEREMIA AFTER BILIARY ENDOSCOPY - AN OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION USING DNA MACRORESTRICTION ANALYSIS [J].
STRUELENS, MJ ;
ROST, F ;
DEPLANO, A ;
MAAS, A ;
SCHWAM, V ;
SERRUYS, E ;
CREMER, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 95 (05) :489-498