Leader-Team Congruence in Power Distance Values and Team Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Procedural Justice Climate

被引:181
作者
Cole, Michael S. [1 ]
Carter, Min Z. [2 ]
Zhang, Zhen [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Christian Univ, Dept Management Entrepreneurship & Leadership, MJ Neeley Sch Business, Ft Worth, TX 76109 USA
[2] Troy Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Sorrell Coll Business, Troy, AL USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Management, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
power distance values; value congruence theory; procedural justice climate; team performance; team organizational citizenship behavior; PERSON-ORGANIZATION; CULTURAL-VALUES; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; CROSS-LEVEL; CONSEQUENCES; WORK; PERFORMANCE; MULTILEVEL; FAIRNESS;
D O I
10.1037/a0034269
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We examine the effect of (in)congruence between leaders' and teams' power distance values on team effectiveness. We hypothesize that the (in)congruence between these values would differentially predict team effectiveness, with procedural justice climate serving as a mediator. Using multisource data and polynomial regression, we found that similarities (and differences) between leaders' and their teams' power distance values can have consequential effects on teams' justice climate and, ultimately, their effectiveness (viz., team performance and team organizational citizenship behavior). We conclude that to fully understand the implications of power distance, one should consider the multiple perspectives of both leaders and team members.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 973
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ANTECEDENTS CONSEQUE
[3]   Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? [J].
Atwater, LE ;
Ostroff, C ;
Yammarino, FJ ;
Fleenor, JW .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :577-598
[4]   Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Walumbwa, Fred O. ;
Weber, Todd J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :421-449
[5]   When Managers and Their Teams Disagree: A Longitudinal Look at the Consequences of Differences in Perceptions of Organizational Support [J].
Bashshur, Michael R. ;
Hernandez, Ana ;
Gonzalez-Roma, Vicente .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 96 (03) :558-573
[6]   Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines [J].
Biemann, Torsten ;
Cole, Michael S. ;
Voelpel, Sven .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2012, 23 (01) :66-80
[7]   Differentiating the Effects of Status and Power: A Justice Perspective [J].
Blader, Steven L. ;
Chen, Ya-Ru .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 102 (05) :994-1014
[8]   Testing and Extending the Group Engagement Model: Linkages Between Social Identity, Procedural Justice, Economic Outcomes, and Extrarole Behavior [J].
Blader, Steven L. ;
Tyler, Tom R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :445-464
[9]  
Brislin R.W., 1981, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, P389
[10]   Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice [J].
Brockner, J ;
Ackerman, G ;
Greenberg, J ;
Gelfand, MJ ;
Francesco, AM ;
Chen, ZX ;
Leung, K ;
Bierbrauer, G ;
Gomez, C ;
Kirkman, BL ;
Shapiro, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 37 (04) :300-315