Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions?

被引:538
作者
Serraj, R
Sinclair, TR [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Sci Semlalia, Dept Biol, Lab Physiol Vegetale, Marrakech 2390, Morocco
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Agron, Agron Physiol & Genet Lab, USDA,ARS,SAA,SMAVE,CGERU, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
crop growth; drought stress; osmotic adjustment;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00754.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Osmolyte accumulating (OA) is frequently cited as a key putative mechanism for increasing yields of crops subjected to drought conditions. The hypothesis is that OA results in a number of benefits that sustain cell and tissue activity under water-deficit Conditions. It has been proposed as an effective tolerance mechanism for water deficits, which could be enhanced in crops by traditional plant breeding, marker-assisted selection or genetic engineering, to generate drought-tolerant crops. However, field studies examining the association between OA and crop yield have tended to show no consistent benefit. The few, often-cited, investigations with positive associations were obtained under severe water deficits with extremely low yields or conditions with special water-supply scenarios when much of the benefit is plant survival. Under conditions where water deficits threaten crop survival, yields are so low that even large fractional yield gains offer little practical benefit to growers. Indeed, the often-cited benefit of turgor maintenance in cells is likely to result in crop behaviour that is exactly opposite to what is beneficial to crops. The one clear mechanism identified in this review for beneficial yield responses to OA is in the maintenance of root development in order to reach water that may be available deeper in the soil profile.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 341
页数:9
相关论文
共 77 条
[41]   DIFFERENCES IN OSMOREGULATION BETWEEN WHEAT GENOTYPES [J].
MORGAN, JM .
NATURE, 1977, 270 (5634) :234-235
[42]   OSMOREGULATION AND WATER-STRESS IN HIGHER-PLANTS [J].
MORGAN, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1984, 35 :299-319
[43]   A GENE CONTROLLING DIFFERENCES IN OSMOREGULATION IN WHEAT [J].
MORGAN, JM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 18 (03) :249-257
[44]   WATER DEFICIT EFFECTS ON MAIZE YIELDS MODELED UNDER CURRENT AND GREENHOUSE CLIMATES [J].
MUCHOW, RC ;
SINCLAIR, TR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (06) :1052-1059
[45]   WHY MEASURE OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT [J].
MUNNS, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 15 (06) :717-726
[46]   Breeding for drought resistance in rice: Physiology and molecular genetics considerations [J].
Nguyen, HT ;
Babu, RC ;
Blum, A .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (05) :1426-1434
[47]   Metabolic engineering of plants for osmotic stress resistance [J].
Nuccio, ML ;
Rhodes, D ;
McNeil, SD ;
Hanson, AD .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 1999, 2 (02) :128-134
[48]   Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in rice: Progress, problems and prospects [J].
Price, A ;
Courtois, B .
PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1999, 29 (1-2) :123-133
[49]   GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TURGOR MAINTENANCE AND GROWTH IN COTTON GERMPLASM [J].
QUISENBERRY, JE ;
CARTWRIGHT, GB ;
MCMICHAEL, BL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1984, 24 (03) :479-482
[50]   Metabolic engineering for stress tolerance: Installing osmoprotectant synthesis pathways [J].
Rathinasabapathi, B .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2000, 86 (04) :709-716