Delayed-type hypersensitivity to fragrance materials in a select North American population

被引:27
作者
Belsito, DV [1 ]
Fowler, JF
Sasseville, D
Marks, JG
De Leo, VA
Storrs, FJ
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[5] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, New York, NY USA
[6] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2310/6620.2006.05027
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: In published reports from Europe, 3- and 4-(4-hydroxy-4-methylpentyl)cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde (HMPCC) (Lyral) has been described as a common cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). In Europe, the rates of reaction to HMPCC among patients undergoing patch testing for suspected ACD have varied from 1.2 to 17.0%, depending on the country. Data on the incidence of sensitivity to HMPCC among North Americans with suspected ACD have not been reported. Objectives: The goals of this study were (1) to assess the incidence of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to HMPCC among patients undergoing patch testing for evaluation of eczematous dermatitis at six centers throughout North America; (2) to determine the most appropriate concentration of HMPCC to use in performing patch tests; and (3) to compare and contrast the incidence rates for HMPCC hypersensitivity to those for other fragrance materials screened with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) screening tray, which includes fragrance mix, Myroxilon pereirae (balsam of Peru), cinnamic aldehyde, ylang ylang oil, jasmine absolute, and tea tree oil. Methods: This report represents the prospective multicenter data on patients tested with the fragrance-related allergens on the NACDG standard screening tray and with HMPCC at 5%, 1.5%, and 0.5% concentrations in petrolatum. Statistical analyses were performed with Student's t-test (two tailed) and the chi-square test. Results: Data from 1,603 patients evaluated at five US sites and one Canadian site were analyzed. Most patients (87.8%) were Caucasian. The majority (67%) were women, and 26.2% had a history consistent with atopic dermatitis. The patients ranged in age from 1 to 88 years, and the mean +/- standard deviation was 46.3 +/- 16.5 years. Myroxilon pereirae (balsam of Peru) and fragrance mix were the most frequent patch-test-positive fragrance allergens (6.6% and 5.9%, respectively). Cinnamic aldehyde (1.7%), ylang ylang oil (0.6%), jasmine absolute (0.4%), HMPCC (0.4% for 5% HMPCC, 0.3% for 1.5% HMPCC, and 0.2% for 0.5% HMPCC), and tea tree oil (0.3%) less frequently yielded positive reactions. Men were more likely than women to be allergic to cinnamic aldehyde. Women were more likely than men to be allergic to jasmine absolute. Atopic patients were no more likely to react to fragrance materials than were nonatopic patients. Patients who reacted to jasmine absolute tended to be older than the general population whereas those who reacted to tea tree oil tended to be younger than the general population. There were no other demographic differences between patients who reacted to a given fragrance material and the entire population studied. Testing with fragrance mix and balsam of Peru failed to identify the majority of patients in this study who were found to be sensitized to jasmine absolute, HMPCC, or tea tree oil. Conclusion: HMPCC is an uncommon allergen in the North American population. We recommend testing with 5% HMPCC in petrolatum for those patients suspected of having a fragrance allergy.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Hydroxymethyl pentylcyclohexene-carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) as a fragrance allergen in the UK [J].
Baxter, KF ;
Wilkinson, SM ;
Kirk, SJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 48 (02) :117-118
[2]   FREQUENCY OF FALSE-NEGATIVE REACTIONS TO THE FRAGRANCE MIX [J].
DEGROOT, AC ;
VANDERKLEY, AMJ ;
BRUYNZEEL, DP ;
MEINARDI, MMHM ;
SMEENK, G ;
VANJOOST, T ;
PAVEL, S .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1993, 28 (03) :139-140
[3]   A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis [J].
Felter, SP ;
Robinson, MK ;
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 47 (05) :257-266
[4]  
FENN RS, 1989, PERFUMER FLAVORIST, V14, P1
[5]  
Frosch PJ, 2002, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V47, P78
[6]   PATCH TESTING WITH FRAGRANCES - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONTACT-DERMATITIS RESEARCH GROUP WITH 48 FREQUENTLY USED CONSTITUENTS OF PERFUMES [J].
FROSCH, PJ ;
PILZ, B ;
ANDERSEN, KE ;
BURROWS, D ;
CAMARASA, JG ;
DOOMSGOOSSENS, A ;
DUCOMBS, G ;
FUCHS, T ;
HANNUKSELA, M ;
LACHAPELLE, JM ;
LAHTI, A ;
MAIBACH, HI ;
MENNE, T ;
RYCROFT, RJG ;
SHAW, S ;
WAHLBERG, JE ;
WHITE, IR ;
WILKINSON, JD .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (05) :333-342
[7]   Lyral® is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances [J].
Frosch, PJ ;
Johansen, JD ;
Menné, T ;
Rastogi, SC ;
Bruze, M ;
Andersen, KE ;
Lepoittevin, JP ;
Arnau, EG ;
Pirker, C ;
Goossens, A ;
White, IR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 141 (06) :1076-1083
[8]   Lyral® has been included in the patch test standard series in Germany [J].
Geier, J ;
Brasch, J ;
Schnuch, A ;
Lessmann, H ;
Pirker, C ;
Frosch, PJ .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 46 (05) :295-297
[9]   Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach [J].
Gerberick, GF ;
Robinson, MK ;
Felter, SP ;
White, IR ;
Basketter, DA .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 45 (06) :333-340
[10]   Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data [J].
Griem, P ;
Goebel, C ;
Scheffler, H .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 38 (03) :269-290