Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography

被引:134
作者
Hoogeveen, RM [1 ]
Bakker, CJG [1 ]
Viergever, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht Hosp, Dept Radiol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1998年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
vessel diameter; MR angiography (MRA); flow simulation; quantitative image analysis;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880080608
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This work addresses the fundamental limits imposed by the MRI process on the accuracy with which vessel diameters and cross-sectional areas can be derived from time-of-flight (TOF) and phase-contrast (PC) MR source images. By means of simulations and in vitro experiments, it is demonstrated that, even in the absence of now-related artifacts, severe inaccuracies in the determination of diameters or cross-sectional areas may occur solely because of the physical process of the MR image acquisition. Resolution and intraluminal saturation have strong effects on the vessel appearance and thus on the diameter estimation error. It is shown that low resolution leads to diameter overestimation or even underestimation and that intraluminal saturation causes severe underestimation, even for relatively low flip angles. Velocity and velocity encoding do not have a major influence on lumen appearance in PC images. Accurate diameter estimations can be attained only if lumen diameters constitute at least three pixels for both TOF and PC acquisitions, provided that intraluminal saturation is suppressed or avoided. Additionally, since the constitution of TOF and PC images is dissimilar, lumina should be analyzed differently to obtain accurate diameters and cross-sectional areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1235
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   ARTIFACTS IN MAXIMUM-INTENSITY-PROJECTION DISPLAY OF MR ANGIOGRAMS [J].
ANDERSON, CM ;
SALONER, D ;
TSURUDA, JS ;
SHAPEERO, LG ;
LEE, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (03) :623-629
[2]   COMPARISON OF PHASE-DIFFERENCE AND COMPLEX-DIFFERENCE PROCESSING IN PHASE-CONTRAST MR ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
BERNSTEIN, MA ;
IKEZAKI, Y .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 1 (06) :725-729
[3]  
Bracewell R. N., 1986, FOURIER TRANSFORM IT, V31999
[4]   QUANTIFICATION OF ATHEROMATOUS STENOSIS IN THE EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID-ARTERY [J].
DEBRAY, JM ;
GLATT, B .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1995, 5 (06) :414-426
[5]   REDUCTION OF PARTIAL-VOLUME ARTIFACTS WITH ZERO-FILLED INTERPOLATION IN 3-DIMENSIONAL MR-ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
DU, YPP ;
PARKER, DL ;
DAVIS, WL ;
CAO, G .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 4 (05) :733-741
[6]  
EVANS AJ, 1993, AM J NEURORADIOL, V14, P721
[7]   CARDIAC-GATED MR-ANGIOGRAPHY OF PULSATILE FLOW - K-SPACE STRATEGIES [J].
FRANCK, A ;
SELBY, K ;
VANTYEN, R ;
NORDELL, B ;
SALONER, D .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (03) :297-307
[8]   UNDERSTANDING ACCELERATION INDUCED DISPLACEMENT ARTIFACTS IN PHASE-CONTRAST MR VELOCITY-MEASUREMENTS [J].
FRAYNE, R ;
RUTT, BK .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (02) :207-215
[9]   MECHANISMS OF SIGNAL LOSS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF STENOSES [J].
GATENBY, JC ;
MCCAULEY, TR ;
GORE, JC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (04) :1049-1057
[10]   IN-VIVO VALIDATION OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE BLOOD-VOLUME FLOW MEASUREMENTS WITH LIMITED SPATIAL-RESOLUTION IN SMALL VESSELS [J].
HOFMAN, MBM ;
VISSER, FC ;
VANROSSUM, AC ;
VINK, GQM ;
SPRENGER, M ;
WESTERHOF, N .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (06) :778-784