Safety and immunogenicity of two influenza virus subunit vaccines, with or without MF59 adjuvant, administered to human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive and -seronegative adults

被引:59
作者
Durando, P. [1 ]
Fenoglio, D. [4 ]
Boschini, A. [5 ]
Ansaldi, F.
Icardi, G.
Sticchi, L.
Renzoni, A.
Fabbri, P. [5 ]
Ferrera, A. [4 ]
Parodi, A. [2 ,3 ]
Bruzzone, B.
Gabutti, G. [6 ]
Podda, A. [7 ]
Del Giudice, G. [7 ]
Fragapane, E. [7 ]
Indiveri, F. [4 ]
Crovari, P.
Gasparini, R.
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci, Sect Hyg & Prevent Med, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Stem Cell Ctr, Anat Pathol Unit, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Stem Cell Ctr, Anat Pathol Unit, San Martino Hosp, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Internal Med, Ctr Excellence Biomed Res, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[5] San Patrignano Med Ctr, I-47852 Coriano, Rimini, Italy
[6] Univ Ferrara, Dept Clin & Expt Med, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
[7] Novartis Vaccines SRL, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1128/CVI.00316-07
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare both the safety and tolerability and the humoral and cell-mediated immune responses for two influenza virus subunit vaccines, one with MF59 adjuvant (Fluad) and one without an adjuvant (Agrippal), in healthy and in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected adult individuals. To achieve this aim, an open, randomized, comparative clinical trial was performed during the 2005-2006 season. A total of 256 subjects were enrolled to receive one dose of vaccine intramuscularly. Blood samples were taken at the time of vaccination and at 1 and 3 months postvaccination. A good humoral antibody response was detected for both vaccines, meeting all the criteria of the Committee for Medical Products for Human Use. After Beyer's correction for prevaccination status, Fluad exhibited better immunogenicity than Agrippal, as shown from the analysis of the geometric mean titers, with significant differences for some virus strains; however, no definitive conclusions on the clinical significance of such results can be drawn, because the method used to estimate antibody response is currently nonstandard for influenza virus vaccines. Significant induction of an antigen-specific CD4(+) T-lymphocyte proliferative response was detected at all time points after immunization, for both the vaccines, among HIV-1-seronegative subjects. This was different from what was observed for HIV-1-infected individuals. In this group, significance was not reached at 30 days postvaccination (T30) for those immunized with Agrippal. Also when data were compared between treatment groups, a clear difference in the response at T30 was observed in favor of Fluad (P = 0.0002). The safety profiles of both vaccines were excellent. For HIV-1-infected individuals, no significant changes either in viremia or in the CD4(+) cell count were observed at any time point. The results showed good safety and immunogenicity for both vaccines under study for both uninfected and HIV-1-infected adults, confirming current recommendations for immunization of this high-risk category.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 259
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Influenza vaccination of HIV-1-positive and HIV-1-negative former intravenous drug users [J].
Amendola, A ;
Boschini, A ;
Colzani, D ;
Anselmi, G ;
Oltolina, A ;
Zucconi, R ;
Begnini, M ;
Besana, S ;
Tanzi, E ;
Zanetti, AR .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2001, 65 (04) :644-648
[2]  
Dooley Samuel W., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P1
[3]   New A/H3N2 influenza variant: a small genetic evolution but a heavy burden on the Italian population during the 2004-2005 season [J].
Ansaldi, F ;
Icardi, G ;
Gasparini, R ;
Campello, C ;
Puzelli, S ;
Bella, A ;
Donatelli, I ;
Salmaso, S ;
Crovari, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (06) :3027-3029
[4]   MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine confers superior immunogenicity in adult subjects (18-60 years of age) with chronic diseases who are at risk of post-influenza complications [J].
Baldo, V. ;
Baldovin, T. ;
Floreani, A. ;
Carraro, A. M. ;
Trivello, R. .
VACCINE, 2007, 25 (20) :3955-3961
[5]   Comparison of three different influenza vaccines in institutionalised elderly [J].
Baldo, V ;
Menegon, T ;
Bonello, C ;
Floreani, A ;
Trivello, R .
VACCINE, 2001, 19 (25-26) :3472-3475
[6]  
BALDO V, J CLIN IMMUNOL
[8]   Seroprotection rate, mean fold increase, seroconversion rate:: which parameter adequately expresses seroresponse to influenza vaccination? [J].
Beyer, WEP ;
Palache, AM ;
Lüchters, G ;
Nauta, J ;
Osterhaus, ADME .
VIRUS RESEARCH, 2004, 103 (1-2) :125-132
[9]   An outbreak of influenza in a residential drug-rehabilitation community [J].
Boschini, Antonio ;
Longo, Benedetta ;
Caselli, Francesca ;
Begnini, Marco ;
De Maria, Cesare ;
Ansaldi, Filippo ;
Durando, Paolo ;
Icardi, Giancarlo ;
Rezza, Giovanni .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2006, 78 (09) :1218-1222
[10]  
CLEMENTS ML, 1997, NEW GENERATION VACCI, P545