Climate adaptation: Institutional response to environmental constraints, and the need for increased flexibility, participation, and integration of approaches

被引:85
作者
Amaru, Stephanie [1 ]
Chhetri, Netra B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Consortium Sci Policy & Outcomes, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Consortium Sci Policy & Outcomes, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Institutions; Climate adaptation; Case studies; Top-down; Bottom-up; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; VULNERABILITY; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; EVOLUTION; DROUGHT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.006
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Adaptation to the impacts of climate change is a dynamic process that is shaped by institutional, cultural, and socioeconomic contexts. Efforts to adapt to changing climate may occur on many scales and may be undertaken by a variety of stakeholders and do not occur in institutional vacuum. As globalization has increased the exchange of knowledge across space, a greater number of institutions have become involved in adaptation measures encompassing multiple scales. In order to gain insight into how adaptation might unfold into the future, we investigate the interactions between institutions operating at multiple levels in the innovation of new technologies on demand. From a broad sample of cases, we identify four distinct types of adaptation measures and select one corresponding case representing each type to assess the roles of institutions (and other stakeholders) in innovation. We further identify and discuss two findings that cut across all adaptation measures: (1) the need for widespread participation, flexibility, and integration of stakeholders for quick and effective response, and (2) the need to transfer leadership and responsibility from institutionally led adaptation measures to community based measures so that adaptation is sustained into the future. Together, these findings suggest that the types of adaptation measures implemented primarily from the top down may not promote local resilience in the long term; likewise, those measures implemented from the bottom up require some level of collaboration from the top to maximize their effectiveness. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 139
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]  
Hayami Y., 1971, AGR DEV INT PERSPECT
[22]  
Hertsgaard M, 2011, SCI AM
[23]   "Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity": Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface [J].
Hinkel, Jochen .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (01) :198-208
[24]  
Kabore P. D, 2004, EMERGENCE SPREADING
[25]   Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions [J].
Klein, RJT ;
Schipper, ELF ;
Dessai, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2005, 8 (06) :579-588
[26]  
Limalevu L, 2010, TIEMPO, V77, P16
[27]  
Marchal J. Y, 1979, MALTRISE PESPACE AGR, P89
[28]  
MATLON P J, 1990, Food Research Institute Studies (Stanford), V22, P1
[29]   INCREASING FOOD-PRODUCTION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA - ENVIRONMENTAL-PROBLEMS AND INADEQUATE TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS [J].
MATLON, PJ ;
SPENCER, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1984, 66 (05) :671-676
[30]  
Morgan R. P. C., 1986, Soil erosion and conservation.