Comparative Study of Breast Implant Rupture Using Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Surgical Findings

被引:62
作者
Di Benedetto, Giovanni [1 ]
Cecchini, Sara [2 ]
Grassetti, Luca [1 ]
Baldassarre, Silvia [2 ]
Valeri, Gianluca [2 ]
Leva, Luca [1 ]
Giuseppetti, Gian Marco [2 ]
Bertani, Aldo [1 ]
机构
[1] Marche Polytech Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, I-60020 Ancona, Italy
[2] Marche Polytech Univ, Dept Radiol, I-60020 Ancona, Italy
关键词
breast implant; implant rupture; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00643.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the detection of breast implant rupture and to make a correlation with findings at explantation. The study population consisted of 63 women with 82 implants, undergoing surgical explantation. Implant rupture status was blindly determined obtaining diagnosis of rupture, possible rupture, or intact implant. Strictly predetermined rupture criteria were applied and compared with findings at surgery, which were considered the gold standard. False-positives and false-negatives were retrospectively evaluated to identify pitfalls in the investigation. All associations between imaging signs and surgical findings were evaluated by using chi-square test. The respective sensitivity and specificity of investigations are reported. Our experience suggests that MRI is the more accurate method for identification of breast implant rupture, even if it should be performed following the diagnostic algorithm proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 537
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   REGIONAL SILICONE-GEL MIGRATION IN PATIENTS WITH RUPTURED IMPLANTS [J].
AHN, CY ;
SHAW, WW .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1994, 33 (02) :201-208
[2]   DEFINITIVE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST IMPLANT RUPTURE USING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
AHN, CY ;
SHAW, WW ;
NARAYANAN, K ;
GORCZYCA, DP ;
SINHA, S ;
DEBRUHL, ND ;
BASSETT, LW .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 92 (04) :681-691
[3]  
Gorczyca D P, 1994, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V2, P659
[4]   The diagnosis of breast implant rupture:: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation [J].
Hölmich, LR ;
Vejborg, I ;
Conrad, C ;
Sletting, S ;
McLaughlin, JK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 53 (02) :213-225
[5]   Prevalence of silicone breast implant rupture among Danish women [J].
Hölmich, LR ;
Kjoller, K ;
Vejborg, I ;
Conrad, C ;
Sletting, S ;
McLaughlin, JK ;
Fryzek, J ;
Breiting, V ;
Jorgensen, A ;
Olsen, JH .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (04) :848-858
[6]   Silicone breast implant rupture: Pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound [J].
Ikeda, DM ;
Borofsky, HB ;
Herfkens, RJ ;
Sawyer-Glover, AM ;
Birdwell, RL ;
Glover, GH .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 104 (07) :2054-2062
[7]   Imaging spectrum of breast implant complications: Mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging [J].
O'Toole, M ;
Caskey, CI .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2000, 21 (05) :351-361
[8]   RADIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST IMPLANT RUPTURE - CURRENT STATUS AND COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES [J].
SAMUELS, JB ;
ROHRICH, RJ ;
WEATHERALL, PT ;
HO, AMW ;
GOLDBERG, KL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 96 (04) :865-877
[9]   Complex radial folds versus subtle signs of intracapsular rupture of breast implants: MR findings with surgical correlation [J].
Soo, MS ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Walsh, R ;
Elenberger, CD ;
Georgiade, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (06) :1421-1427