A highly sensitive and specific method for the screening detection of genetically modified organisms based on digital PCR without pretreatment

被引:54
作者
Fu, Wei [1 ]
Zhu, Pengyu [2 ]
Wang, Chenguang [2 ]
Huang, Kunlun [2 ,3 ]
Du, Zhixin [4 ]
Tian, Wenying [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Qin [1 ]
Wang, Huiyu [1 ]
Xu, Wentao [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Shuifang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Inspect & Quarantine, Inst Plant Quarantine, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Nutr Engn, Lab Food Safety, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr, Supervis Inspect & Testing Ctr Genetically Modifi, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Entry Exit Inspect & Quarantine Bur, Guangxi 530028, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
关键词
MODIFIED MAIZE; DNA; QUANTIFICATION; QUANTITATION;
D O I
10.1038/srep12715
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Digital PCR has developed rapidly since it was first reported in the 1990s. It was recently reported that an improved method facilitated the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). However, to use this improved method, the samples must be pretreated, which could introduce inaccuracy into the results. In our study, we explored a pretreatment-free digital PCR detection method for the screening for GMOs. We chose the CaMV35s promoter and the NOS terminator as the templates in our assay. To determine the specificity of our method, 9 events of GMOs were collected, including MON810, MON863, TC1507, MIR604, MIR162, GA21, T25, NK603 and Bt176. Moreover, the sensitivity, intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory reproducibility of our detection method were assessed. The results showed that the limit of detection of our method was 0.1%, which was lower than the labeling threshold level of the EU. The specificity and stability among the 9 events were consistent, respectively. The intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory reproducibility were both good. Finally, the perfect fitness for the detection of eight double-blind samples indicated the good practicability of our method. In conclusion, the method in our study would allow more sensitive, specific and stable screening detection of the GMO content of international trading products.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Arumuganathan K., 1991, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep, V9, P208, DOI [10.1007/BF02672069, DOI 10.1007/BF02672069]
  • [2] Effect of sustained elevated temperature prior to amplification on template copy number estimation using digital polymerase chain reaction
    Bhat, Somanath
    McLaughlin, Jacob L. H.
    Emslie, Kerry R.
    [J]. ANALYST, 2011, 136 (04) : 724 - 732
  • [3] The applicability of digital PCR for the assessment of detection limits in GMO analysis
    Burns, M. J.
    Burrell, A. M.
    Foy, C. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 231 (03) : 353 - 362
  • [4] The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments
    Bustin, Stephen A.
    Benes, Vladimir
    Garson, Jeremy A.
    Hellemans, Jan
    Huggett, Jim
    Kubista, Mikael
    Mueller, Reinhold
    Nolan, Tania
    Pfaffl, Michael W.
    Shipley, Gregory L.
    Vandesompele, Jo
    Wittwer, Carl T.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (04) : 611 - 622
  • [5] Assessment of droplet digital PCR for absolute quantification of genetically engineered OXY235 canola and DP305423 soybean samples
    Demeke, Tigst
    Graefenhan, Tom
    Holigroski, Michelle
    Fernando, Ursla
    Bamforth, Janice
    Lee, Sung-Jong
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2014, 46 : 470 - 474
  • [6] Tolerance of Droplet-Digital PCR vs Real-Time Quantitative PCR to Inhibitory Substances
    Dingle, Tanis C.
    Sedlak, Ruth Hall
    Cook, Linda
    Jerome, Keith R.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (11) : 1670 - 1672
  • [7] Comparison of nine different real-time PCR chemistries for qualitative and quantitative applications in GMO detection
    Gasparic, Meti Buh
    Tengs, Torstein
    Luis La Paz, Jose
    Holst-Jensen, Arne
    Pla, Maria
    Esteve, Teresa
    Zel, Jana
    Gruden, Kristina
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 396 (06) : 2023 - 2029
  • [8] Resolution of Cell Fate Decisions Revealed by Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis from Zygote to Blastocyst
    Guo, Guoji
    Huss, Mikael
    Tong, Guo Qing
    Wang, Chaoyang
    Sun, Li Li
    Clarke, Neil D.
    Robson, Paul
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2010, 18 (04) : 675 - 685
  • [9] KINETIC PCR ANALYSIS - REAL-TIME MONITORING OF DNA AMPLIFICATION REACTIONS
    HIGUCHI, R
    FOCKLER, C
    DOLLINGER, G
    WATSON, R
    [J]. BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 11 (09): : 1026 - 1030
  • [10] High-Throughput Droplet Digital PCR System for Absolute Quantitation of DNA Copy Number
    Hindson, Benjamin J.
    Ness, Kevin D.
    Masquelier, Donald A.
    Belgrader, Phillip
    Heredia, Nicholas J.
    Makarewicz, Anthony J.
    Bright, Isaac J.
    Lucero, Michael Y.
    Hiddessen, Amy L.
    Legler, Tina C.
    Kitano, Tyler K.
    Hodel, Michael R.
    Petersen, Jonathan F.
    Wyatt, Paul W.
    Steenblock, Erin R.
    Shah, Pallavi H.
    Bousse, Luc J.
    Troup, Camille B.
    Mellen, Jeffrey C.
    Wittmann, Dean K.
    Erndt, Nicholas G.
    Cauley, Thomas H.
    Koehler, Ryan T.
    So, Austin P.
    Dube, Simant
    Rose, Klint A.
    Montesclaros, Luz
    Wang, Shenglong
    Stumbo, David P.
    Hodges, Shawn P.
    Romine, Steven
    Milanovich, Fred P.
    White, Helen E.
    Regan, John F.
    Karlin-Neumann, George A.
    Hindson, Christopher M.
    Saxonov, Serge
    Colston, Bill W.
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 83 (22) : 8604 - 8610