Fairness at the Collective Level: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Consequences and Boundary Conditions of Organizational Justice Climate

被引:156
作者
Whitman, Daniel S. [1 ]
Caleo, Suzette [2 ]
Carpenter, Nichelle C. [3 ]
Horner, Margaret T. [3 ]
Bernerth, Jeremy B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Rucks Dept Management, EJ Ourso Coll Business, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
justice; performance; unit level; meta-analysis; climate; LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; REFERENT COGNITIONS; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; MODERATING ROLE; LABOR UNION; ANTECEDENTS; TEAMS; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1037/a0028021
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article uses meta-analytic methods (k = 38) to examine the relationship between organizational justice climate and unit-level effectiveness. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between justice and effectiveness is significant (rho = .40) when both constructs are construed at the collective level. Our results also indicate that distributive justice climate was most strongly linked with unit-level performance (e.g., productivity, customer satisfaction), whereas interactional justice was most strongly related to unit-level processes (e.g., organizational citizenship behavior, cohesion). We also show that a number of factors moderate this relationship, including justice climate strength, the level of referent in the justice measure, the hierarchical level of the unit, and how criteria are classified. We elaborate on these findings and attempt to provide a clearer direction for future research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / 791
页数:16
相关论文
共 134 条
[91]   Validity of Observer Ratings of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Oh, In-Sue ;
Wang, Gang ;
Mount, Michael K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 96 (04) :762-773
[92]  
Ostroff C., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P211
[93]   Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice perceptions in hierarchical decision-making teams [J].
Phillips, JM .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (01) :32-64
[94]   Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing [J].
Price, Kenneth H. ;
Harrison, David A. ;
Gavin, Joanne H. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1375-1384
[95]   Determining the significance of correlations corrected for unreliability and range restriction [J].
Raju, NS ;
Brand, PA .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 27 (01) :52-71
[96]  
Raver J., 2006, AC MAN M ATL GA
[97]  
Rawls J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
[98]  
Roberson Q., 2006, SOC JUSTICE RES, V19, P323
[99]  
Roberson Q. M., ACAD MANAGE IN PRESS
[100]  
Roberson QM, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P595, DOI 10.2307/20159146