Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength

被引:32
作者
Haider, Ifaz T. [1 ]
Speirs, Andrew D. [1 ]
Frei, Hanspeter [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Femoral fracture; Finite element analysis; Impact loading; Hydraulic stiffening; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; HUMAN TRABECULAR BONE; HUMAN CORTICAL BONE; PROXIMAL FEMUR; ANATOMIC SITE; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES; STRAIN DISTRIBUTION; SIDEWAYS FALL; MUSCLE FORCES; HIP FRACTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.004
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 [生物物理学];
摘要
Patient specific quantitative CT (QCT) imaging data together with the finite element (FE) method may provide an accurate prediction of a patient's femoral strength and fracture risk. Although numerous FE models investigating femoral fracture strength have been published, there is little consent on the effect of boundary conditions, dynamic loading and hydraulic strengthening due to intra-medullary pressure on the predicted fracture strength. We developed a QCT-derived FE model of a proximal femur that included node-specific modulus assigned based on the local bone density. The effect of three commonly used boundary conditions published in literature were investigated by comparing the resulting strain field due to an applied fracture load. The models were also augmented with viscoelastic material properties and subject to a realistic impact load profile to determine the effect of dynamic loads on the strain field. Finally, the effect of hydraulic strengthening was investigated by including node specific permeability and performing a coupled pore diffusion and stress analysis of the FE model. Results showed that all boundary conditions yield the same strain field patterns, but peak strains were 22% lower and fracture load was 18% higher when loaded at the greater trochanter than when loaded at the femoral head. Comparison of the dynamic models showed that material viscoelasticity was important, but inertial effects (vibration and shock) were not. Finally, pore pressure changes did not cause significant hydraulic strengthening of bone under fall impact loading. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2121
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone [J].
Bayraktar, HH ;
Gupta, A ;
Kwon, RY ;
Papadopoulos, P ;
Keaveny, TM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (06) :677-684
[2]
Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method [J].
Bessho, Masahiko ;
Ohnishi, Isao ;
Matsuyama, Juntaro ;
Matsumoto, Takuya ;
Imai, Kazuhiro ;
Nakamura, Kozo .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (08) :1745-1753
[3]
Bryant J D, 1988, Eng Med, V17, P55, DOI 10.1243/EMED_JOUR_1988_017_017_02
[4]
ON HYDRAULIC STRENGTHENING OF BONES [J].
BRYANT, JD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (03) :353-354
[5]
COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF BONE AS A 2-PHASE POROUS STRUCTURE [J].
CARTER, DR ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (07) :954-962
[6]
Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA [J].
Cody, DD ;
Gross, GJ ;
Hou, FJ ;
Spencer, HJ ;
Goldstein, SA ;
Fyhrie, DP .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (10) :1013-1020
[7]
EFFECTS OF LOADING RATE ON STRENGTH OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR [J].
COURTNEY, AC ;
WACHTEL, EF ;
MYERS, ER ;
HAYES, WC .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 55 (01) :53-58
[8]
Finite element modelling of the vibrational behaviour of the human femur using CT-based individualized geometrical and material properties [J].
Couteau, B ;
Hobatho, MC ;
Darmana, R ;
Brignola, JC ;
Arlaud, JY .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 31 (04) :383-386
[9]
Bone poroelasticity [J].
Cowin, SC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (03) :217-238
[10]
INFLUENCE OF THIGH MUSCLES ON THE AXIAL STRAINS IN A PROXIMAL FEMUR DURING EARLY STANCE IN GAIT [J].
CRISTOFOLINI, L ;
VICECONTI, M ;
TONI, A ;
GIUNTI, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (05) :617-624