Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas

被引:96
作者
Hobbs, BF [1 ]
Horn, GTF [1 ]
机构
[1] PLANIT MANAGEMENT,VANCOUVER,BC V6K 1X4,CANADA
关键词
electricity utility planning; decision analysis; public participation;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00025-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are one means of quantifying stakeholder values, but the way such methods are usually applied can cause people to feel manipulated by a 'black-box' methodology. An approach is proposed to mitigate this problem, It asks each person to apply two or more methods and to then resolve disagreements in the results in order to build understanding. The approach recognizes that no single method is best for every person. We describe a successful application by a diverse stakeholder group. The results confirm that decisions yielded by alternative MCDM methods can disagree and that a multimethod approach builds insight and confidence. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 375
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ANDREWS CJ, 1992, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V12, P209
[2]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN JUDGMENTS OPTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[4]  
*BC GAS, 1995, INT RES PLAN
[5]  
Chankong V., 1983, Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology
[6]  
Cohon J., 1978, Multiobjective programming and planning
[7]  
Corner JL., 1995, J MULTICRITERIA DECI, V4, P107, DOI DOI 10.1002/mcda.4020040204
[8]   CONFLICTING OBJECTIVES AND RISK IN POWER-SYSTEM PLANNING [J].
CROUSILLAT, EO ;
DORFNER, P ;
ALVARADO, P ;
MERRILL, HM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1993, 8 (03) :887-893
[9]  
Delbecq AL., 1975, Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Techniques
[10]   CAN UTILITY COMMISSIONS IMPROVE ON ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS [J].
DODDS, DE ;
LESSER, JA .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1994, 70 (01) :63-76