RETRACTED: SQUID-detected ultra-low field MRI (Retracted Article)

被引:15
作者
Espy, Michelle [1 ]
Matlashov, Andrei [1 ]
Volegov, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Ultra-low fields (ULFs); SQUID detection; ULF MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; CONCOMITANT GRADIENTS; NEURONAL-ACTIVITY; MICROTESLA MRI; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; RELAXATION; NMR; INSTRUMENTATION; STIMULATION; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2012.11.030
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
MRI remains the premier method for non-invasive imaging of soft-tissue. Since the first demonstration of ULF MRI the trend has been towards ever higher magnetic fields. This is because the signal, and efficiency of Faraday detectors, increases with ever higher magnetic fields and corresponding Larmor frequencies. Nevertheless, there are many compelling reasons to continue to explore MRI at much weaker magnetic fields, the so-called ultra-low field or (ULF) regime. In the past decade many excellent proof-of-concept demonstrations of ULF MRI have been made. These include combined MRI and magnetoencephalography, imaging in the presence of metal, unique tissue contrast, and implementation in situations where a high magnetic field is simply impractical. These demonstrations have routinely used pulsed pre-polarization (at magnetic fields from similar to 10 to 100 mT) followed by read-out in a much weaker (1-100 mu T) magnetic fields using the ultra-sensitive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) sensor. Even with pre-polarization and SQUID detection, ULF MRI suffers from many challenges associated with lower magnetization (i.e. signal) and inherently long acquisition times compared to conventional >1 T MRI. These are fundamental limitations imposed by the low measurement and gradient fields used. In this review article we discuss some of the techniques, potential applications, and inherent challenges of ULF MRI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [41] Nieminen J., 2012, AALTO U PUBLICATION
  • [42] Avoiding eddy-current problems in ultra-low-field MRI with self-shielded polarizing coils
    Nieminen, Jaakko O.
    Vesanen, Panu T.
    Zevenhoven, Koos C. J.
    Dabek, Juhani
    Hassel, Juha
    Luomahaara, Juho
    Penttila, Jari S.
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2011, 212 (01) : 154 - 160
  • [43] Solving the problem of concomitant gradients in ultra-low-field MRI
    Nieminen, Jaakko O.
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2010, 207 (02) : 213 - 219
  • [44] Polarization encoding as a novel approach to MRI
    Nieminen, Jaakko O.
    Burghoff, Martin
    Trahms, Lutz
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2010, 202 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [45] Inability to directly detect magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity
    Parkes, Laura M.
    de Lange, Floris P.
    Fries, Pascal
    Toni, Ivan
    Norris, David G.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 57 (02) : 411 - 416
  • [46] Precise mapping of early visual responses in space and time
    Poghosyan, Vahe
    Ioannides, Andreas A.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 35 (02) : 759 - 770
  • [47] Pruessmann KP, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P952, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO
  • [48] 2-S
  • [49] Regan D., 1989, Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine