RETRACTED: SQUID-detected ultra-low field MRI (Retracted Article)

被引:15
作者
Espy, Michelle [1 ]
Matlashov, Andrei [1 ]
Volegov, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Ultra-low fields (ULFs); SQUID detection; ULF MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; CONCOMITANT GRADIENTS; NEURONAL-ACTIVITY; MICROTESLA MRI; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; RELAXATION; NMR; INSTRUMENTATION; STIMULATION; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2012.11.030
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
MRI remains the premier method for non-invasive imaging of soft-tissue. Since the first demonstration of ULF MRI the trend has been towards ever higher magnetic fields. This is because the signal, and efficiency of Faraday detectors, increases with ever higher magnetic fields and corresponding Larmor frequencies. Nevertheless, there are many compelling reasons to continue to explore MRI at much weaker magnetic fields, the so-called ultra-low field or (ULF) regime. In the past decade many excellent proof-of-concept demonstrations of ULF MRI have been made. These include combined MRI and magnetoencephalography, imaging in the presence of metal, unique tissue contrast, and implementation in situations where a high magnetic field is simply impractical. These demonstrations have routinely used pulsed pre-polarization (at magnetic fields from similar to 10 to 100 mT) followed by read-out in a much weaker (1-100 mu T) magnetic fields using the ultra-sensitive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) sensor. Even with pre-polarization and SQUID detection, ULF MRI suffers from many challenges associated with lower magnetization (i.e. signal) and inherently long acquisition times compared to conventional >1 T MRI. These are fundamental limitations imposed by the low measurement and gradient fields used. In this review article we discuss some of the techniques, potential applications, and inherent challenges of ULF MRI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [51] Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity
    Schoelvinck, Marieke L.
    Maier, Alexander
    Ye, Frank Q.
    Duyn, Jeff H.
    Leopold, David A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (22) : 10238 - 10243
  • [52] Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using magnetic labeling of water proton spins within the detection slice
    Schwarzbauer, C
    Morrissey, SP
    Haase, A
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (04) : 540 - 546
  • [53] A 4.2 K receiver coil and SQUID amplifier used to improve the SNR of low-field magnetic resonance images of the human arm
    Seton, HC
    Hutchison, JMS
    Bussell, DM
    [J]. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 8 (02) : 198 - 207
  • [54] Low-Noise Pulsed Pre-Polarization Magnet Systems for Ultra-Low Field NMR
    Sims, James R.
    Schillig, Josef B.
    Swenson, Charles A.
    Gardner, David L.
    Matlashov, Andrei N.
    Ammerman, Curtt N.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2010, 20 (03) : 752 - 755
  • [55] Takeda T., 1953, MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAP
  • [56] Magnetic resonance imaging with T1 dispersion contrast
    Ungersma, SE
    Matter, NI
    Hardy, JW
    Venook, RD
    Macovski, A
    Conolly, SM
    Scott, GC
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 55 (06) : 1362 - 1371
  • [57] Vesanen P.T., MAGN RESON IN PRESS
  • [58] The Spatial and Temporal Distortion of Magnetic Fields Applied Inside a Magnetically Shielded Room
    Vesanen, Panu T.
    Nieminen, Jaakko O.
    Zevenhoven, Koos C. J.
    Dabek, Juhani
    Simola, Juha
    Sarvas, Jukka
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2012, 48 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [59] Simultaneous magnetoencephalography and SQUID detected nuclear MR in microtesla magnetic fields
    Volegov, P
    Matlachov, AN
    Espy, MA
    George, JS
    Kraus, RH
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 52 (03) : 467 - 470
  • [60] On concomitant gradients in low-field MRI
    Volegov, PL
    Mosher, JC
    Espy, MA
    Kraus, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2005, 175 (01) : 103 - 113