Success in treating renal calculi with single-access, single-event percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is a routine "second look" necessary?

被引:18
作者
Davol, PE [1 ]
Wood, C [1 ]
Fulmer, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Med Ctr, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Danville, PA 17822 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.20.289
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective procedure for the treatment of large renal calculi. An important consideration for patients undergoing PCNL is the management of any residual stone burden, which may include "second-look" nephroscopy. The utility of this practice is unproven, and we present our data on a series of patients in which second-look procedures were not performed. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 43 consecutive patients undergoing a total of 45 procedures by a single surgeon at a tertiary-care center. Patients were considered stone free if no calculi were evident by either plain film or noncontrast CT scan. Statistical analysis was used to look for correlations between radiographic stone clearance and various patient and stone characteristics. Results: Of these procedures, 15% had immediate postoperative evidence of residual fragments. At a mean follow-up of 8 months, 32.5% had residual or recurrent stone. There were statistically significant correlations between both patient age and stone size and the risk of recurrent or residual stone. Conclusions: In our study, PCNL was effective for the single-stage treatment of large renal calculi. Aggressive stone clearance obviated the need for routine second-look nephroscopy. Factors leading to an increased risk of residual or recurrent calculi included the presence of a staghorn calculus and younger patient age. The excellent stone-free rates achieved suggest that routine second-look nephroscopy may not be necessary for the majority of patients undergoing PCNL.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 292
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC AND RADIOLOGICAL RESIDUAL FRAGMENT RATE FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY [J].
DENSTEDT, JD ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
PICUS, DD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (04) :703-705
[2]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update [J].
Kim, SC ;
Kuo, RL ;
Lingeman, JE .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :235-241
[3]   Complete staghorn calculi: Random prospective comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and combined with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy [J].
Meretyk, S ;
Gofrit, ON ;
Gafni, O ;
Pode, D ;
Shapiro, A ;
Verstandig, A ;
Sasson, T ;
Katz, G ;
Landau, EH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (03) :780-786
[4]   Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy [J].
Pearle, MS ;
Watamull, LM ;
Mullican, MA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (01) :23-26
[5]   The use of shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi [J].
Putman, SS ;
Hamilton, BD ;
Johnson, DB .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) :117-121
[6]   Renal calculi - Percutaneous management [J].
Ramakumar, S ;
Segura, JW .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (04) :617-+